ShadowsPapa
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Bill
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2019
- Threads
- 247
- Messages
- 40,442
- Reaction score
- 53,860
- Location
- Runnells, Iowa
- Vehicle(s)
- '25 JTMX, '23 JLU 4xe, '82 SX4, '73 Javelin
- Occupation
- Retired auto mechanic, frmr gov't ntwrk security admin
- Vehicle Showcase
- 3
NHTSA CAFE numbers - don't meat the goal, get fined for every 1/10th mpg below that goal......It does seem like the whole poorly executed setup went something like this:
-Let's add A.S.S. to claim we're saving the environment!
Blame the government.
Sorry, that's not the reason at all, not even close. It's not a matter of capacity, and there's no added stress.-Oh crap, now we're stressing the shit out of the battery, we need more capacity, but a bigger battery won't fit!
that's because it's not supposed to be that way - it was never ever about battery capacity, was never about needing more batteries for capacity. It was for protection of the electronics, prevent the normal stress of cutting power to them when already alive by the starter kicking in.-I know, let's just add a second smaller battery wedged into an awkward location and without any of the circuitry of a normal dual battery system!
It's nothing to do with capacity. That's been shown by people simply disconnecting the aux battery.
Sponsored
nothing against Napa but the distance.