All very valid. Still seems cool. You can actually get it for about the same price as a rubicon. 50s to mid 60sI like them, but for me the nails in the coffin were in no particular order:
- Expensiver
- Fuel economy is asinine for a daily driver (or otherwise)
- A heavy 2500 frame with compromised payload/towing
- No one will wave at me
- Likely too heavy for sand
- Too wide for most of my hunting trails
From what I recall the power wagon started at a hair over $56k, but I was after the 75th anniversary package which was like a $12,000 option. So… maybe that is somewhat objective as the Gladiator I built is a lot less than the PW I’d spec out.All very valid. Still seems cool. You can actually get it for about the same price as a rubicon. 50s to mid 60s
I shared it’s little a giant oversized rubicon. Never meant to compare them side by side. Apples and oranges. Not so much a direct competitor. Only comparison I made was they are a similar price range. But for some one who needs more space. It’s as close to a rubicon as you can get. Even though it’s really different.So wait, in one thread we've got some dingleberry trying to convince everyone that the Bronco is too big to be compared to the Wrangler, but then we've got this thread asking why a damn Power Wagon isn't being compared to a Rubicon?
I must've taken a wrong turn out of reality somewhere...