Maximus Gladius
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Kevin
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2021
- Threads
- 58
- Messages
- 2,256
- Reaction score
- 2,610
- Location
- Calgary, AB, Canada
- Vehicle(s)
- 2021 Gladiator Rubicon
- Occupation
- Construction, Gold Mining, Surface Engineer
- Thread starter
- #1
Now that’s a pretty bold statement to make and post this thread saying it but now that I’m just past 4000k kms on my warranty replaced 4th auto transmission, …I decided to try driving this one a little differently to see if the manual shift feature, (I used a lot only for slowing down) had a significant roll in bringing about my third transmission’s demise and pump failure at only 32k kms.
As it was becoming apparent that the third transmission was experiencing problems and noted by the oil analysis lab to change the oil and filter because the IRON wear was too high, I had much time to critically think what could possibly be causing it’s failure. The 4th tranny was put in and I decided to not use the manual shift to assist in slowing down (which my brake pads benefited from) greatly and I wanted to see what impact this would have on the transmission in the wear department.
The first oil analysis proves the transmission is healthy right out of the gate and the second report was done at 3950k kms, pretty much at the same kms the third transmission report was done and we can see a HUGE reduction in wear not using the manual shift.
I’ve thought long and hard about this and the numbers don’t lie. Cause and effect law applies here and we can see this. I’ll be pulling samples and getting analysis reports at the same times as the third transmission to see if this theory holds true.
My conclusion is this 850RE transmission should not use the manual shift feature for slowing down if we can see expedited wear as a result. Now that said, I would use it if I’m coming down a mountain pass and I don’t want to burn the brakes out so there’s times it’s needed but it was far to easy for me to use it often in the city to slow down. It’s a cool feature so I used it. But I have also been able to not use it and be ok too. I figure brake pads are cheap andI’m still on my first pair at 80k kms.
(first image is 4th tranny)
(Second image is 3rd tranny)
As it was becoming apparent that the third transmission was experiencing problems and noted by the oil analysis lab to change the oil and filter because the IRON wear was too high, I had much time to critically think what could possibly be causing it’s failure. The 4th tranny was put in and I decided to not use the manual shift to assist in slowing down (which my brake pads benefited from) greatly and I wanted to see what impact this would have on the transmission in the wear department.
The first oil analysis proves the transmission is healthy right out of the gate and the second report was done at 3950k kms, pretty much at the same kms the third transmission report was done and we can see a HUGE reduction in wear not using the manual shift.
I’ve thought long and hard about this and the numbers don’t lie. Cause and effect law applies here and we can see this. I’ll be pulling samples and getting analysis reports at the same times as the third transmission to see if this theory holds true.
My conclusion is this 850RE transmission should not use the manual shift feature for slowing down if we can see expedited wear as a result. Now that said, I would use it if I’m coming down a mountain pass and I don’t want to burn the brakes out so there’s times it’s needed but it was far to easy for me to use it often in the city to slow down. It’s a cool feature so I used it. But I have also been able to not use it and be ok too. I figure brake pads are cheap andI’m still on my first pair at 80k kms.
(first image is 4th tranny)
(Second image is 3rd tranny)
Sponsored