dcmdon
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Don
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2021
- Threads
- 60
- Messages
- 3,656
- Reaction score
- 4,427
- Location
- Boston Metro-West, Northern NH
- Vehicle(s)
- .
Where its "built" isn't really relevant any more. Although I would avoid anything that puts money into the Chinese pockets.Too bad it's not built in America, that's a deal breaker for me
But back to the original point. What matters most really is domestic content. How much of the value of the vehicle is made in the US?
The Ranger is built in the US but is only 45% US or Canadian content.
There aren't any domestic content numbers out for the Maverick that I can find yet. But it will be interesting.
The other factor is the fact that "domestic" in most analyses is US and Canada. That helps FCA's products look more domestic because Chrysler has plants in Canada. Notably their new battery plant is going to be in an expansion of their Windsor plant.
Finally, what is domestic?
Is a Jeep owned by an Italian company that ships its profits to Italy any more "domestic" than a Honda built in a plant in Ohio by a US subsidiary that keeps its profits here and plows them back into plant expansion?
GM is buying interiors from China and putting them in US cars.
Volvo and Tesla are now assembling entire cars in China.
IMHO, its less about where a vehicle is assembled than where the money is going. I don't want to put money in the Chinese hands. But I'm find with helping out Mexico for example. Especially these days when the US has more jobs than workers.
Sponsored