Search results

Spilled onto the next page- "Distance between wheel arches- 44.8" " Pretty standard for the segment. Only the Ridgeline has 48" between the wheel wells, because the tires don't articulate (if you can even use that term) in an arc, but straight up and down.

Unfortunately, it sounds like the latter- there's an optional Trac-lock available for non-Rubicon JT's (and JLs). Also looks like the Max Tow, which gives you wide 4.10 axles is restricted to the Automatic. It makes for a perfect starting point for those who want to put their JT on 35's, but...

Padding- makes it quieter and a little warmer.

I think I would have preferred a straight carry-over of the JLU rear seats- they fold down with the seat cushion dropping into the foot well- this makes the area a lower, larger shelf. Not a deal breaker though.

The problem with the decked line is how much space is wasted in the bed. But since the bed on rhe JT isn’t a stepside design w/o wheel wells inside, they should be offering a system.

The JT uses rhe JLU doors out of necessity- without this part sharing, it never would have come into existence.

Wait! If the truck is called “Gladiator” then it leaves “Gladiator” to be used to name a trim level.

In a heartbeat. I’d opt out of that sillyness outright. I do not like it, Sam I am. In he early JK days, you could fet a Sport (or maybe it was an X) with 3.73 gears, swaybar disconnect and trulock rear axle.

Most of it IS cosmetic, except for these things- 3.73 axle ratio has previously only been indicated for the diesel- both standard and Rubicon spec. From what we'd seen so far, the JT was to have higher GCW numbers despite sharing the 3.45 axle ratios of the JL Sport and Sahara. The Axles models...

Both motors have about the same torque band, with the manual, the Toyota has a little deeper gears (after 1st), spaced closer.