If the market for such a truck someone out of all the auto manufacturers would make it. I just do not understand why this will not die and why this subject must highjack every single thread on this forum. I understand that you want a two door, I have seen your posts on every single thread on...
I noticed that too but I assumed everyone else was like me...my dog rides up front and the family rides in the back.
In all honesty she does get her own seat in the van.
If you want a "lifestyle vehicle" that will haul your Grizzly then who cares if it will carry a 4x8 sheet of plywood? As for being butt hurt your the one who has decided to change your argument and hurl insults at those who disagreed with your opinion. Sounds like a blue stater to me.
In general this type of forum is for people who want to come and discuss the pros and cons of a vehicle with the vast majority leaning towards the pros. I subscribe to the theory my grandmother taught us that if you don’t have anything nice to say then don’t say it. I see some guys walking...
Just like the other guys have said it is not a work truck and never was intended to be. I think they got it right as a “lifestyle vehicle.” A 2 door version is useless to me, if I go hunting with a couple buddies I don’t want my kids and dog to have to ride outside. I wonder if people are...
I have all but given up on the full-time 4wd option on Gladiator. If the t-case stick had a 4-auto someone would have spotted it by now and mentioned it in one of the multiple videos and articles I have come across. the only other explanation could be that Jeep didn't bring a 4-auto to the...
Looks like a match to me. Like I said I’m no expert, and I think that proves it. We still have the debate about what full-time torque management means in the specifications document.
Look closer. The one in the first pic has bolts located on a flange that holds the two halves of the case together. the one in the Gladiator has bolts that pass all the way through the case. Both are a fixed yoke and all transfer cases share the same general shape.
Here is a picture of the Gladiator Rubicon T-case lifted off of another thread. It does not look anything like the NV transfer case in the second photo from the link provided above so I am lead to believe that NV will not be producing the t-case for Gladiator. At least it will not be the same...
I have not seen BLD referred to as torque management in any Jeep literature or publication. The video you posted uses BLD not Full-Time Torque management like the FCA document I linked to does. I read the entire document that I linked to and it mentions that Ram Trucks use a Borg Warner T-case...
I guess it is all a matter of opinion. But I will note that the overland will not have a LS diff in the front it will have an open diff. I will be getting the Rubicon because of the lockers and I just hope that I am interpreting the document correctly and I will have the option of a full time...
The command and rock have nothing to do with the axles, the main difference in the two is the gear reduction of low range. Now that being said the rock-trac is only available in Rubicon modes which, of course, have the lockers in the axles.
I have had Jeeps for 20 years and they have all said full time 4wd or part time. Actually I have had my 1993 ZJ for 26 years now and when I pull the transfer case the "Part Time" light illuminates. That is not my ZJ transfer case because I just have the Part Time 4wd in mine so I lifted the...
http://media.fcanorthamerica.com/newsrelease.do?id=16376&mid=
That link is from a few years ago but several times it mentions full-time torque management as a system that sends torque to either the front or rear axle without driver input. I took this to assume that a 4wd Auto will be an option...
I thought so to but I copied that directly from the document in the first post of this thread. Just to make sure I even looked up Jeep torque management and it is a full-time 4wd system.