chorky
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Chad
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2022
- Threads
- 175
- Messages
- 3,466
- Reaction score
- 3,801
- Location
- Montana
- Website
- www.youtube.com
- Vehicle(s)
- '22JTR, '06 LJ, '06 TJ GE
- Build Thread
- Link
- Occupation
- GIS Specialist
- Thread starter
- #1
Any tech super-users here?
I am in need of 3 monitors for home. 2 27" and a 35"-50" ultra wide.
For work I am a Esri ArcPro super user. Basically I make maps and do all sorts of analysis over 2,000,000 acres (over 3,000 sq mi) of national forest. Since I can justify working from home a significant amount, I am working on upgrading the home office. However, on my personal time I would like to use 2 of these monitors for personal mapping (on my MacBook Pro with the M1 Max chipset) and edit photos via Lightroom and photoshop. So two monitors need to have great resolution, and one needs to be ultra wide (so basically 2 27" monitors in one) for easier use of Arc.
There is a TON of options these days, and specifications that don't seem to match prices accordingly. Since it has been years since I left the custom computer world I am in need of advice.
This 27" LG monitor (https://www.amazon.com/LG-Ultrafine...-CTM/dp/B0BDTVYDBV?ref_=ast_sto_dp&th=1&psc=1) keeps popping up at me. It looks to have 2000:1 contrast ratio, although I dont know what the amount of colors are. I also don't understand this 400 'nits' terminology. What is more confusing is this is almost twice the cost at about $600 compared to another option of the same contrast ratio and same 'nits'. I think one was LED and the other LCD possibly? But the specs available from LG are pretty sub-par
An Apple tech told me the other day that so long as I find a quality 4K monitor, it will be decently close to the MacBook Pro monitor - realizing apple is particularly good with their display quality with 1 billion colors and a crazy contrast ratio. But I dont want to spend $5K just for one monitor!
Switching gears, a third monitor in ultra wide is more confusing. LG also has several options but they seem to be lower in quality (which would be fine for ArcPro use). However, more acronyms like QHD+ or DQHD don't make sense. Further, why is the vertical pixel amount so terrible and so varied. For example one is 5120x1440 (https://www.amazon.com/LG-49WQ95C-W...ncTM/dp/B0B5K851GV?ref_=ast_sto_dp&th=1&psc=1) and another is 3840x1600 (https://www.amazon.com/LG-38WN95C-W-Inch-Curved-Connectivity/dp/B0892MHG9H?ref_=ast_sto_dp)?
I currently am using 2 27" Samsung monitors from the office for home (only for use with work stuff), and 2 Asus monitors at the office - the display is fine for work related tasks, colors are far from calibrated though as they are pretty cheap - only in the high 100 dollar range. I mention LG above only because their explanations seem to represent a better display than what Samsung offers - but that could just be more monies put toward the marketing department than LG budgets - I am not partial to any particular brand.
Anywho. I'm confused and this is too much money to be making a mistake. Anyone able to offer suggestions or insight? I could study up and figure it out but could also use that time for Jeep stuff haha.
And dont worry tax payers this is coming out of my own pocket since I will be using it a good amount on my personal time - you already paid for a very expensive computer, thank you.
I am in need of 3 monitors for home. 2 27" and a 35"-50" ultra wide.
For work I am a Esri ArcPro super user. Basically I make maps and do all sorts of analysis over 2,000,000 acres (over 3,000 sq mi) of national forest. Since I can justify working from home a significant amount, I am working on upgrading the home office. However, on my personal time I would like to use 2 of these monitors for personal mapping (on my MacBook Pro with the M1 Max chipset) and edit photos via Lightroom and photoshop. So two monitors need to have great resolution, and one needs to be ultra wide (so basically 2 27" monitors in one) for easier use of Arc.
There is a TON of options these days, and specifications that don't seem to match prices accordingly. Since it has been years since I left the custom computer world I am in need of advice.
This 27" LG monitor (https://www.amazon.com/LG-Ultrafine...-CTM/dp/B0BDTVYDBV?ref_=ast_sto_dp&th=1&psc=1) keeps popping up at me. It looks to have 2000:1 contrast ratio, although I dont know what the amount of colors are. I also don't understand this 400 'nits' terminology. What is more confusing is this is almost twice the cost at about $600 compared to another option of the same contrast ratio and same 'nits'. I think one was LED and the other LCD possibly? But the specs available from LG are pretty sub-par
An Apple tech told me the other day that so long as I find a quality 4K monitor, it will be decently close to the MacBook Pro monitor - realizing apple is particularly good with their display quality with 1 billion colors and a crazy contrast ratio. But I dont want to spend $5K just for one monitor!
Switching gears, a third monitor in ultra wide is more confusing. LG also has several options but they seem to be lower in quality (which would be fine for ArcPro use). However, more acronyms like QHD+ or DQHD don't make sense. Further, why is the vertical pixel amount so terrible and so varied. For example one is 5120x1440 (https://www.amazon.com/LG-49WQ95C-W...ncTM/dp/B0B5K851GV?ref_=ast_sto_dp&th=1&psc=1) and another is 3840x1600 (https://www.amazon.com/LG-38WN95C-W-Inch-Curved-Connectivity/dp/B0892MHG9H?ref_=ast_sto_dp)?
I currently am using 2 27" Samsung monitors from the office for home (only for use with work stuff), and 2 Asus monitors at the office - the display is fine for work related tasks, colors are far from calibrated though as they are pretty cheap - only in the high 100 dollar range. I mention LG above only because their explanations seem to represent a better display than what Samsung offers - but that could just be more monies put toward the marketing department than LG budgets - I am not partial to any particular brand.
Anywho. I'm confused and this is too much money to be making a mistake. Anyone able to offer suggestions or insight? I could study up and figure it out but could also use that time for Jeep stuff haha.
And dont worry tax payers this is coming out of my own pocket since I will be using it a good amount on my personal time - you already paid for a very expensive computer, thank you.
Sponsored
