ShadowsPapa
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Bill
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2019
- Threads
- 247
- Messages
- 40,514
- Reaction score
- 54,043
- Location
- Runnells, Iowa
- Vehicle(s)
- '25 JTMX, '23 JLU 4xe, '82 SX4, '73 Javelin
- Occupation
- Retired auto mechanic, frmr gov't ntwrk security admin
- Vehicle Showcase
- 3
If I recall correctly, the 4.0 weighed in at OVER 500 pounds. (510 or 515 or whatever)I find myself agreeing yet again. I think there is ample power in the 3.6L not overly abundant but ample. A Jeep is desired with gearing in mind.
In my Rubicon for example with a 4:1 transfer case I dont care how big a motor you got it wouldn't make a bit of difference. You can only go so fast 25mph I think it says .
Additionally I like the weight of the 3.6L I have had 2 diesel full size trucks and they was as worthless as tit's on a boar hog in most any off road situation and sunk like a rock in soft material.
The 3.6L is light literally weighs 400 pounds. So it stays on top of material much much better..
3 cheers for the small but mighty 3.6L Pentastar V6 .
The AMC V8 of that time was 550 or something like that.
So you had an I6 coming in at only about 40 pounds lighter than a full V8 such as the 401
Weight matters today - with companies struggling to get the last 1/100 of a mile per gallon out of a vehicle........ trimming a few pounds off matters. It's one reason the frames are high strength steel - they could use normal steel and build a frame just as strong or stronger, but at great cost in weight.
The 3.6 is amazingly light for the power in an OLDER design!
Sponsored