ecidiego
Well-Known Member
I mean what does that or your other post have anything to do with being able to drive on the beach and dunes?
Sponsored
I mean what does that or your other post have anything to do with being able to drive on the beach and dunes?
It def is smaller than when I use to go in college almost 20 years agoOceano is the sole place.
I am sure some tree huggers are trying to ban it.
Wut means that it doesnt make any sense, in this case, it makes no sense to the topic at hand.Dunno, You snarked with "wut?" I didn't bring it up.
They are banning it I believeOceano is the sole place.
I am sure some tree huggers are trying to ban it.
Except the people own the land, not the governmentIt's typically learned by Kindergarten that when your teacher or parents take something away that you were not using properly, that it is your fault for misuse, not their fault for taking it away.
They are banning it in the main area people know today. It's being cut back to a section a little over a mile long. All beach, no dunes. Will allow 500 campers.They are banning it I believe
I dunno my dad use to take my stuff away so he could go play with them!!It's typically learned by Kindergarten that when your teacher or parents take something away that you were not using properly, that it is your fault for misuse, not their fault for taking it away.
A ban by any other nameThey are banning it in the main area people know today. It's being cut back to a section a little over a mile long. All beach, no dunes. Will allow 500 campers.

No, the government owns the land for use by the people. Mix of federal, state, and local jurisdictions. The area people had been driving on was state.Except the people own the land, not the government
There is a comment in the article about "financial inequity" . Sounds like tree huggers jealous they can't afford RVs and ATVs. If they can't camp there due to no toys, neither can you!A ban by any other name
"environmental injustice"![]()
Yeah I have no idea what the hell that is supposed to mean or entail.A ban by any other name
"environmental injustice"![]()
Hmmm, us Libertarians don’t have a “far right boogeyman man” but we sure do hate the third world shiatthole that California has become.Also, CA is not communist. That's just the boogey man scary term right wingers enjoy but don't understand.
I don’t think you understand how this worksNo, the government owns the land for use by the people. Mix of federal, state, and local jurisdictions. The area people had been driving on was state.
Might want to inquire with the Injuns about that. They may differ slightly.No, the government owns the land for use by the people. Mix of federal, state, and local jurisdictions. The area people had been driving on was state.