Im not sure how any of companies are handling that....in for answers.
I was torn between the Magnuson and Edelbrock, but the cooling capacity of the Magnuson crushes the Edelbrock and that won me over.
I did a mix match because FabTech made springs specific for our shocks and it was set up for 37’s. But man its tall. Its 3” over stock, so 4” over rubicon. So then I added the rest of the lift parts I wanted.
Are you committed to the airbag install yet?
You have to understand how fuel trim adaptation works. I think “high flow intake” is the best name.
There’s a thread explaining how fuel trim adaptation works; and it’s about how ecu’s adapt to fluid dynamics and friction of air through a pipe.
It’s a Maker’s night with friends and dogs.
Me and my Rhodesian Ridgeback “Scout”. I got him as a pump on deployment. Fed him exclusively from my hand for 6 months and take him everywhere possible. He’s my buddy and we have an awesome relationship.
Remember i am a sample size of one, and others tow with 4.88 fine. But knowing the transmission doesnt lock up as early would make me want more gear. Others counter with the opinion that its going to downshift either way, so why go deeper. Both are valid opinions. Im happy with my 4.88’s...
Id recommend correcting castor one way or another. The closer you can get caster to 6° The better. The anti dive under hard breaking from geo brackets is an added bonus.
I did both geo brackets and control arms on my 4” lift and the drive is superb