spectre6000
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2021
- Threads
- 10
- Messages
- 555
- Reaction score
- 588
- Location
- Mountains above Denver
- Vehicle(s)
- pending
Rear ended. I don't have a JT yet (MY22 was a huge disappointment, and I barely drive what I have), but if you go out and look about where the bed meets the cab, you'll see a little hole or something in the frame. That's a weak spot they intentionally created to absorb energy in a rear collision scenario. The frame deforms (down so as to not go into the cab of the offending vehicle), and absorbs and redirects the energy from the impact.I was wondering about the bed and what caused that angle.
If you look with a mind toward forensics, the front of the truck (aside from being completely burned away) is structurally in tact. The rear is not, as described above. It's not impossible this truck was part of a multicar incident and the fire started elsewhere, but statistically it's more likely that it was just this and whatever rear ended it. I've been up close to four vehicle fires in my life, and only one involved in a collision. All four started in the engine bay, so it's likely that whatever hit it caught fire in the engine bay, and it spread. If whoever did the hitting didn't turn the key off, the fuel pump could have kept spraying until the battery finally gave up delivering voltage, and that can be a long time depending on where the battery and fuse block are located (a number of cars have the batteries in the rear and the fuse block in the cab, for instance).
Sponsored
Last edited: