chorky
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Chad
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2022
- Threads
- 175
- Messages
- 3,466
- Reaction score
- 3,801
- Location
- Montana
- Website
- www.youtube.com
- Vehicle(s)
- '22JTR, '06 LJ, '06 TJ GE
- Build Thread
- Link
- Occupation
- GIS Specialist
It would be cool to see some of the CAD drawings and stress loadings that Jeep has come up with to better see why they use what they use in particular fasteners or frame design.There's a reason Jeep has the values they do.
If the replacement parts are of the same size and class bolt (for example - the original bolt is 10.9 and the replacement is also the same size and 10.9 class) I'd use Jeep's torques.
In the case of nuts - Jeep is saying to not re-use because they have locking compound in the threads. Pitman, tie rod, drag link, etc. - factory nuts have locking compound and/or are lock nuts and not to be re-used, or should have adequate locking compound re-applied.
For the bolts, some can be re-used, some should not be re-used. I'd always use the Jeep specs on bolts.
Tapered joints must be pulled together with adequate force to hold, and bolted joints rely on clamping force. If the bolts are different (flange bolt compared to non-flange bolt) the forces will be different. I never use a straight nut or bolt where flange nuts or bolts have been used.
Jeep's had issues, and experience trying to keep things tight.
But that's me and how I've always done rebuilds over the years.
Sponsored