Sponsored

EcoDeisel, Should I?

Used EcoDeisel or Current Mojave?


  • Total voters
    68

NotSo Bright White

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tim
Joined
Jul 29, 2021
Threads
9
Messages
534
Reaction score
1,424
Location
Nor Cal
Vehicle(s)
2021 JTR DIESEL
Occupation
Retire Fireman
Vehicle Showcase
1
thats a solid combo
Thanks! My new TeraFlex wheels came yesterday but still waiting on tires for the Mojave. Needs to order the AEV lift still. It is never ending!
Sponsored

 

Jefe1018

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2020
Threads
48
Messages
3,123
Reaction score
5,256
Location
NV
Vehicle(s)
Sold the 21 JT Rubi Ecodiesel, now a 4.5 gen Powerwagon
Build Thread
Link
Buying the eco diesel yes gives you more torque ,but replacemnt parts and any other part is more expensive. You said you wanted to do the trans American. I chose other . Why ? Stay with the Gasser . It is the most versatile fuel more readily available, parts easier to aquire. Imagine being on the transamerican and the fuel pump going out on that diesel. You might as well sell it for junk right there cause you will be screwed. I know that's a wild example but your asking for trouble in that respect. The Gas Rubicon will be more reliable and allow for more piece of mind. Heck you could even just buy a few parts to have with you and still be okay and when I say Gasser I mean 3.6L
Imagine being on the trans-American and having wild unexplained misfires followed by a dropped valve seat and worn cam lobes.

Anything mechanical can fail and all engines make sacrifices and have items that fail at a higher rate than others.
 
OP
OP
PuddleJumper

PuddleJumper

Well-Known Member
First Name
Cortlund
Joined
Jan 17, 2024
Threads
68
Messages
2,540
Reaction score
3,373
Location
Alexandria, Virginia
Vehicle(s)
23' JTM, 22' JTR, 22' F56S,
Build Thread
Link
Occupation
STACK Infrastructure Critical Operations Technician
Vehicle Showcase
1
Thanks! My new TeraFlex wheels came yesterday but still waiting on tires for the Mojave. Needs to order the AEV lift still. It is never ending!
tell me about it. "constant improvement" lol
 
OP
OP
PuddleJumper

PuddleJumper

Well-Known Member
First Name
Cortlund
Joined
Jan 17, 2024
Threads
68
Messages
2,540
Reaction score
3,373
Location
Alexandria, Virginia
Vehicle(s)
23' JTM, 22' JTR, 22' F56S,
Build Thread
Link
Occupation
STACK Infrastructure Critical Operations Technician
Vehicle Showcase
1
Imagine being on the trans-American and having wild unexplained misfires followed by a dropped valve seat and worn cam lobes.

Anything mechanical can fail and all engines make sacrifices and have items that fail at a higher rate than others.
I think his argument lies in that the 3.6 is a more readily available a crate motor many other countries whereas the 3.0 would not. If you need a replacement so to speak. I think in the Americas it may be harder to source a 3.0 in Argentina than a 3.6. This may have more relevance if wheeling in Africa so to speak. This why I didn't really bring up reliability in my choice of motors. The 3.6, 3.0 and 6.4 all have common catastrophic failures that can happen to them. Your just as equally screwed in the case of a blown motor, regardless of the motor.
 

Jefe1018

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2020
Threads
48
Messages
3,123
Reaction score
5,256
Location
NV
Vehicle(s)
Sold the 21 JT Rubi Ecodiesel, now a 4.5 gen Powerwagon
Build Thread
Link
I think his argument lies in that the 3.6 is a more readily available a crate motor many other countries whereas the 3.0 would not. If you need a replacement so to speak. I think in the Americas it may be harder to source a 3.0 in Argentina than a 3.6. This may have more relevance if wheeling in Africa so to speak. This why I didn't really bring up reliability in my choice of motors. The 3.6, 3.0 and 6.4 all have common catastrophic failures that can happen to them. Your just as equally screwed in the case of a blown motor, regardless of the motor.
Agreed, if it dies in some other country you as indeed screwed financially at the best and maybe worse on the end other end.

ā€œMore reliableā€ and ā€œgas is more readily availableā€ is very subjective vs objective my point.
 

ZeeJay

Well-Known Member
First Name
Sure,Not
Joined
Mar 24, 2024
Threads
7
Messages
424
Reaction score
876
Location
Island of Misfit Toys
Vehicle(s)
98 5.9 Limited ZJ, 96 4.0 Laredo ZJ, 23 JT Willys
Occupation
What’s work?
I think his argument lies in that the 3.6 is a more readily available a crate motor many other countries whereas the 3.0 would not. If you need a replacement so to speak. I think in the Americas it may be harder to source a 3.0 in Argentina than a 3.6. This may have more relevance if wheeling in Africa so to speak. This why I didn't really bring up reliability in my choice of motors. The 3.6, 3.0 and 6.4 all have common catastrophic failures that can happen to them. Your just as equally screwed in the case of a blown motor, regardless of the motor.
I lost a skirt and wiped #4. Before I got my poop in group to find a suitable spot in the absolute middle of nowhere Nevada 100 miles from the nearest ranch house #4 grabbed the wall and locked up. That was on a ā€˜97 ZJ with a 4.0, an engine that is a thousand times more reliable than a 3.6, 3.0, or a 6.4. Skirt drama isn’t rare on 4.0s but to kill the engine is. So yeah shit happens to anything anywhere. Making far out what if’s is not really a good argument.
Sponsored

 
 







Top