Sponsored

ShadowsPapa

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bill
Joined
Oct 12, 2019
Threads
247
Messages
40,463
Reaction score
53,908
Location
Runnells, Iowa
Vehicle(s)
'25 JTMX, '23 JLU 4xe, '82 SX4, '73 Javelin
Occupation
Retired auto mechanic, frmr gov't ntwrk security admin
Vehicle Showcase
3
Aren't all hemi's cast iron block vs the pentastar aluminum cast block?
ironic that the pseudo/faux hemi is still cast iron while the LS engines are aluminum.

faux-hemi heads are aluminum.

So it's V8 cast iron vs. the 3.6 die cast block (vs. just cast)
Sponsored

 

PuddleJumper

Well-Known Member
First Name
Cortlund
Joined
Jan 17, 2024
Threads
68
Messages
2,540
Reaction score
3,373
Location
Alexandria, Virginia
Vehicle(s)
23' JTM, 22' JTR, 22' F56S,
Build Thread
Link
Occupation
STACK Infrastructure Critical Operations Technician
Vehicle Showcase
1
ironic that the pseudo/faux hemi is still cast iron while the LS engines are aluminum.

faux-hemi heads are aluminum.

So it's V8 cast iron vs. the 3.6 die cast block (vs. just cast)
so thats why its boat anchor. I thought so.
 

ShadowsPapa

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bill
Joined
Oct 12, 2019
Threads
247
Messages
40,463
Reaction score
53,908
Location
Runnells, Iowa
Vehicle(s)
'25 JTMX, '23 JLU 4xe, '82 SX4, '73 Javelin
Occupation
Retired auto mechanic, frmr gov't ntwrk security admin
Vehicle Showcase
3
so thats why its boat anchor. I thought so.
It's still a very heavy engine considering that engines of the past might weigh 600-650 pounds with cast iron heads, intake, exhaust manifolds and more. Small blocks or the AMC 401 - roughly 550 pounds, all cast iron.
 

Stan H

Well-Known Member
First Name
Stanley
Joined
Oct 26, 2022
Threads
10
Messages
5,508
Reaction score
5,489
Location
WV
Vehicle(s)
Gladiator Rubicon 2021
Occupation
Safety Consultant
Aren't all hemi's cast iron block vs the pentastar aluminum cast block?
Yes that I believe your correct on because it said it was a 90degree cast iron for the 6.4
 

Stan H

Well-Known Member
First Name
Stanley
Joined
Oct 26, 2022
Threads
10
Messages
5,508
Reaction score
5,489
Location
WV
Vehicle(s)
Gladiator Rubicon 2021
Occupation
Safety Consultant
It's still a very heavy engine considering that engines of the past might weigh 600-650 pounds with cast iron heads, intake, exhaust manifolds and more. Small blocks or the AMC 401 - roughly 550 pounds, all cast iron.
And dont forget its 500 DRY WEIGHT.
That is minus oil 7.0 quarts ( 10pounds approx) and antifreeze ( maybe 10+ pounds floating around in there )
 

Sponsored

AmosMoses

Well-Known Member
First Name
Amos
Joined
Jun 25, 2022
Threads
41
Messages
944
Reaction score
1,854
Location
Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2020 jeep gladiator sport
Occupation
Manufacturing
What is the engine weight of the diesel that they used in the gladiator?

What is the weight difference between the 3.6 jlu and the 4XE jlu?
 

Stan H

Well-Known Member
First Name
Stanley
Joined
Oct 26, 2022
Threads
10
Messages
5,508
Reaction score
5,489
Location
WV
Vehicle(s)
Gladiator Rubicon 2021
Occupation
Safety Consultant
What is the engine weight of the diesel that they used in the gladiator?

What is the weight difference between the 3.6 jlu and the 4XE jlu?
Oh Lord Lots of research to find all that out :CWL:
 

AmosMoses

Well-Known Member
First Name
Amos
Joined
Jun 25, 2022
Threads
41
Messages
944
Reaction score
1,854
Location
Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2020 jeep gladiator sport
Occupation
Manufacturing
Oh Lord Lots of research to find all that out :CWL:
Iam very curious because someone voiced weight concerns of putting a huge V8 in our tiny trucks.
 

Stan H

Well-Known Member
First Name
Stanley
Joined
Oct 26, 2022
Threads
10
Messages
5,508
Reaction score
5,489
Location
WV
Vehicle(s)
Gladiator Rubicon 2021
Occupation
Safety Consultant
What is the engine weight of the diesel that they used in the gladiator?

What is the weight difference between the 3.6 jlu and the 4XE jlu?
485ibs. Compacted Graphite Iron block steel crank and aluminum alloy heads.

Screenshot_20250811_122613_DuckDuckGo.webp
 

jmr

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jim
Joined
May 25, 2024
Threads
9
Messages
213
Reaction score
419
Location
Wentzville, MO
Vehicle(s)
'24 JL Unlimited Rubicon, '25 JT Mojave
Occupation
Software Developer
They will use a different transmission and full time 4WD transfer case so that will add to the weight. Maybe they should try the 3.0L Hurricane the SO/HO easily outperform the 5.7 and 392.
 

Sponsored

PuddleJumper

Well-Known Member
First Name
Cortlund
Joined
Jan 17, 2024
Threads
68
Messages
2,540
Reaction score
3,373
Location
Alexandria, Virginia
Vehicle(s)
23' JTM, 22' JTR, 22' F56S,
Build Thread
Link
Occupation
STACK Infrastructure Critical Operations Technician
Vehicle Showcase
1
They will use a different transmission and full time 4WD transfer case so that will add to the weight. Maybe they should try the 3.0L Hurricane the SO/HO easily outperform the 5.7 and 392.
that i wouldn't mind. lets get back to the inline 6 days.
 

BourbonRunner

Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Jul 10, 2022
Threads
17
Messages
1,475
Reaction score
2,903
Location
Baltimore
Vehicle(s)
'22 JTM, '04 E46. I hate my money and it shows.
Occupation
Foole
. Also from a legal standpoint, what happens when we swap management in 2 year and the odds of the EPA to come back in full swing? What Jeep gonna do with all of these non compliant models?
Even if there was a reversion to CAFE fines, the vehicles subject to it on lots would likely be negligible-this admin is in until Jan 2029. JT is contracted to the UAW through 2028 but it doesn't guarantee numbers built. If the tea leaves were changing Jeep could throttle down production in advance. Furthermore, I don't know for certain but I thought CAFE fines were hitched to units built per year, not actual sales. I'm confident the fines can't be made retroactive to vehicles built in 2028 if that's the case.

2 years is way to short for that gamble. Not to mention it shows Jeep still isn't listening, most gladiator owners don't want a 392 Mojave/Rubicon X @ 145k MSRP. We want a Willys or Max Tow w/ a 5.7 as a 3k option.
Tt is a major gamble and you're right, it doesn't make much sense. Then again, Jeep and Stellysler have been doing things that don't make sense for some time so it would track.

That said, the 5.7 and 392 could live side by side in the stable. A 5.7L option on a Max Tow, Rubicon and Mojave with a halo $100K 392 monster would be wild.
 

PuddleJumper

Well-Known Member
First Name
Cortlund
Joined
Jan 17, 2024
Threads
68
Messages
2,540
Reaction score
3,373
Location
Alexandria, Virginia
Vehicle(s)
23' JTM, 22' JTR, 22' F56S,
Build Thread
Link
Occupation
STACK Infrastructure Critical Operations Technician
Vehicle Showcase
1
Even if there was a reversion to CAFE fines, the vehicles subject to it on lots would likely be negligible-this admin is in until Jan 2029. JT is contracted to the UAW through 2028 but it doesn't guarantee numbers built. If the tea leaves were changing Jeep could throttle down production in advance. Furthermore, I don't know for certain but I thought CAFE fines were hitched to units built per year, not actual sales. I'm confident the fines can't be made retroactive to vehicles built in 2028 if that's the case.



Tt is a major gamble and you're right, it doesn't make much sense. Then again, Jeep and Stellysler have been doing things that don't make sense for some time so it would track.

That said, the 5.7 and 392 could live side by side in the stable. A 5.7L option on a Max Tow, Rubicon and Mojave with a halo $100K 392 monster would be wild.
I want whatever the Execs at Stellantis/Jeep are smoking. It must be amazing
 

ShadowsPapa

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bill
Joined
Oct 12, 2019
Threads
247
Messages
40,463
Reaction score
53,908
Location
Runnells, Iowa
Vehicle(s)
'25 JTMX, '23 JLU 4xe, '82 SX4, '73 Javelin
Occupation
Retired auto mechanic, frmr gov't ntwrk security admin
Vehicle Showcase
3
Iam very curious because someone voiced weight concerns of putting a huge V8 in our tiny trucks.
It's a valid point.

Also valid ........ is the placement of the weight.
The 4xe weight is low center. It actually improves stability and ride. (that's been brought up in a number of videos by long-time Jeep people on youtube as well as other articles)

Payload, well.......

I compared as we have a 2023 Rubicon 4xe..

The standard JLU Rubicon with 3.6 is about 4500 pounds
The standard JLU Rubicon 4xe is about 5200 pounds.
The JLU Rubicon with a 6.4 is about 5100 pounds

Some of the above differences are the transmission and transfer case, again, low and center.

However, the bulk of the weight sits in the center, just ahead of the rear wheels, and really down low, below the rear seats. The bulks of the extra weight, in other words, is under the rear seats.
Engine weight of a V8 will be above the axles and up front.

If you figure a V8's extra weight, the required transfer case and transmission, you'll be taking away what, about 600 pounds from payload - without other modifications?

Does that sound about right?
 

Stan H

Well-Known Member
First Name
Stanley
Joined
Oct 26, 2022
Threads
10
Messages
5,508
Reaction score
5,489
Location
WV
Vehicle(s)
Gladiator Rubicon 2021
Occupation
Safety Consultant
It's a valid point.

Also valid ........ is the placement of the weight.
The 4xe weight is low center. It actually improves stability and ride. (that's been brought up in a number of videos by long-time Jeep people on youtube as well as other articles)

Payload, well.......

I compared as we have a 2023 Rubicon 4xe..

The standard JLU Rubicon with 3.6 is about 4500 pounds
The standard JLU Rubicon 4xe is about 5200 pounds.
The JLU Rubicon with a 6.4 is about 5100 pounds

Some of the above differences are the transmission and transfer case, again, low and center.

However, the bulk of the weight sits in the center, just ahead of the rear wheels, and really down low, below the rear seats. The bulks of the extra weight, in other words, is under the rear seats.
Engine weight of a V8 will be above the axles and up front.

If you figure a V8's extra weight, the required transfer case and transmission, you'll be taking away what, about 600 pounds from payload - without other modifications?

Does that sound about right?
I would say that is close on the money when you consider as I stated with fluids.
Sponsored

 
 







Top