RudeJeepin
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Carl
- Joined
- May 6, 2022
- Threads
- 5
- Messages
- 1,512
- Reaction score
- 2,388
- Location
- Washington
- Vehicle(s)
- 2022 JTRD
- Build Thread
- Link
Sponsored
The problem I have with his numbers argument is that from the get go, something like 80%+ of the principle engineering and testing of the JT was a cut and past job from the Wrangler JL. The late then FCA Sergio Marchionne at launch had said there would not have been a JT without the JL carry the water for it and knew the sales numbers would be low for a "niche" vehicle in their words.
Perhaps they are afraid that if they rate it for 3,500 lbs. of towing it will either not sell in the face of the other trims that tow 7,000 or more.....OR maybe they're worried that people will assume it can tow 7,000 lbs. anyhow leading to lots of overheating and warranty claims. Just a guess.The problem I have with his numbers argument is that from the get go, something like 80%+ of the principle engineering and testing of the JT was a cut and past job from the Wrangler JL. The late then FCA Sergio Marchionne at launch had said there would not have been a JT without the JL carry the water for it and knew the sales numbers would be low for a "niche" vehicle in their words.
So the question is why does any of the Wrangler JL V8 goodness not carry over for the same reasons? I know cooling has always been the big issue mainly for towing, but they can easily derate the tow numbers to push out a HEMI V8 the JT and it would still sell.
Would it? Seriously - would it? Or is that the internet magnifying the voices of the vocal few?but they can easily derate the tow numbers to push out a HEMI V8 JT and it would still sell.
RAM Power Wagon falls into the same criteria. Both towing and payload are significantly reduced from a normal RAM 2500 but most buyers are astute to know what they are getting into with one.Perhaps they are afraid that if they rate it for 3,500 lbs. of towing it will either not sell in the face of the other trims that tow 7,000 or more.....OR maybe they're worried that people will assume it can tow 7,000 lbs. anyhow leading to lots of overheating and warranty claims. Just a guess.
Yes and Yes.Would it? Seriously - would it?
Not apples to apples as in the Jeep case - they can currently buy a JLU V8RAM Power Wagon falls into the same criteria. Both towing and payload are significantly reduced from a normal RAM 2500 but most buyers are astute to know what they are getting into with one.
I’ll never understand buying a JT and bobbing the bed. Buy a damn JLU. I have seen some claim they still tow with it. Maybe. But not many do..
On the other hand, I do sometimes wonder why do 1/4 of the people here even have a JT - they could do great with a JLU............... they don't tow or haul anything.
The gladiator is surprisingly long in comparison to a full sized truck I used to park every day next to a crew cab Ram 1500 and his truck was maybe 6” longer. You’re correct on width and so wheelbase makes a difference. The gladiator has long wheelbase, but it’s more on par with a regular cab truck.I dont know if it would, The weight and suspension do have differences.
I owned a JKU and was always pissed off that it couldn't tow very much or haul very much. It always rocked back and forth .
Same motor I have now ( basically) and same HP and torque . So what makes it tow more. Length and Suspension..
More HP in the gladiator won't do anything to make it a more effective truck. What makes a more effective truck is wider longer heavier and bigger Suspension.. then a bigger motor and transmission follows . . Putting a V8 in a Gladiator is counter productive .
JLU and JT same width.I dont know if it would, The weight and suspension do have differences.
I owned a JKU and was always pissed off that it couldn't tow very much or haul very much. It always rocked back and forth .
Same motor I have now ( basically) and same HP and torque . So what makes it tow more. Length and Suspension..
More HP in the gladiator won't do anything to make it a more effective truck. What makes a more effective truck is wider longer heavier and bigger Suspension.. then a bigger motor and transmission follows . . Putting a V8 in a Gladiator is counter productive .
You are entitled to that opinion I guess.Not apples to apples as in the Jeep case - they can currently buy a JLU V8
There's no reason for a JT
The PW has aspects that the 2500 doesn't have.
I get what you’re saying, but the 392 had always had a much bigger premium in price. What if they did a 5.7l for a significantly lower price than a 6.4l JLU and only available fully loaded? What if it was available across multiple trim levels vs having to get a loaded rubicon? That would be amazing.JLU and JT same width.
A 2026 JLU Rubicon with a 3.6 can tow 5,000 pounds.
If you don't tow, but you do off-road, and want a V8, buy a Wrangler.
You will have a fair amount of cargo space, the same cabin area, but much better for off-road experiences.
Not really the last off road thing I disagree with. There is the reason some are bobbing the beds. Which defeats the purpose of a truck but all ya have to do is raise the gladiator up till it doesnt drag.it will eventually surpass a stock wrangler.just have to crunch the numbers. Most who are serious off road people will modify either to their liking I feel.JLU and JT same width.
A 2026 JLU Rubicon with a 3.6 can tow 5,000 pounds.
If you don't tow, but you do off-road, and want a V8, buy a Wrangler.
You will have a fair amount of cargo space, the same cabin area, but much better for off-road experiences.
Had a huge premium I'd bet in part to cover their CAFE fines which are 0 now.I get what you’re saying, but the 392 had always had a much bigger premium in price. What if they did a 5.7l for a significantly lower price than a 6.4l JLU and only available fully loaded? What if it was available across multiple trim levels vs having to get a loaded rubicon? That would be amazing.