PyrPatriot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2019
- Threads
- 193
- Messages
- 2,668
- Reaction score
- 1,875
- Location
- Kentucky, USA
- Vehicle(s)
- JT Sport S Max Tow; Honda Element
I get 17-18mpg driving city roads, hills and traffic. Highway it is 23mpg. I havent gotten 400mi out of a tank since I got the JT. First tank read 440mi on the range it it got 400 before I bothered filling it up. Low gas light didnt go on even. After that it seems I am filling up less and less despite waiting for the fuel light to come on. Havent filled up 20gal since I bought itThe unsprung weight is still hauled by the engine and bigger tires mean a change in ratio, more tire width means more work for the engine.
Payload is more about what the vehicle can hold up than what it can pull. Towing is to me where the heavier wheels and tires would matter because you are having to actually get them rolling and haul them up a hill.
In any case, a skinnier tire rolls easier on the road. The aggressive tread some move to sucks power from that engine when on the highway. Engine load contributes to the heat generated - and thus has to be removed by the cooling system.
When you change tires for LOOKS you are giving up an advantage that was engineered into the vehicle.
Tire size - including WIDTH was figured in due to rolling resistance. And the weight does factor when you are pulling up a hill. It takes more energy to change the speed and direction of a heavier tire and more energy to get it rolling and keep it rolling especially if it's wider. And that's what BOTH Sport S and Rubicon people are doing for looks. (so make a choice - do you want it to look better in your eyes, or do you want MPG and long life for the truck?)
I care how mine looks but having built and repaired vehicles for decades and having factory training - I also consider the technical aspects of changes. So I'll think carefully before making any major changes to tires, wheels, height, and other accessories.
By the way, maybe we overland folks need a forum - no one seems to even admit they exist - sort of like who cares, oh, yeah, by the way, I guess they do offer that one, too - but really who cares? - but for those who give a rip about the lowly red-headed step child level, my JT Overlandwent FOUR HUNDRED MILES - yes, that's 400 - miles on a single tanks of gas.
And it was windy as hell today as the Canadians exported their biggest natural resource - cold air, and it hit hard dropping temps about 20 degrees, with 20 mph or so winds. I drove about 30 miles to a doc appointment after filling the tank and already am at 18.6 mpg on this second tank.
So for those complaining about gas mileage - You, too, could get MPG if you really wanted it but choose looks over function.
That's my opinion. You can't have both.
Anyway, I guess no one wanted to read that article about what it took to get the capacities and MPG and all - it's NOT just weight, not just this or that, it's a package that had to be designed to work together.
Sponsored
. Honestly, I never considered one when I ordered, so I don't know much about it. Only heard it's the Sahara luxury with all the bells and whistles, w/o the Rubi off-road stuff. Had a 2door JK Sahara and loved it. A sleeping 3rd shifter driving home at 6am turned left in front of me while I was doing 55mph. I broadsided him in his right front fender (no braking) and launched him 50yrds into a field. Police said my aftermarket steel bumper saved our lives because our engine would have been in our lap. Anyways, I'm rambling on. Hopefully you don't take offense to your Overland being left out of my question, but it was directed to the Rubi defenders