I looked into this as well. Seemed like the general consensus is go V8 if youāre going down that path. Supercharging doesnāt give you much more down low like the V8 does. Sure is spendy though.
This is stupid logic. I donāt take mine off-road much. It just stays in the garage naked and taken out on nice days. Use it for errands. Or going to the hardware store. Or hauling motorcycles to the track. But most of the time itās just simply enjoyed naked. Try to think harder next time if it...
The generalizations you make of groups is unreal. Kind've like the circle jerking Wrangler and Gladiator mall crawlers. Yes, all Jeep owners are true off-road enthusiasts. No Jeep fanboys here. Let it go and get over yourself.
We had one open in the Kansas City metro area a few years ago. It's in a nice area, and they seem to get a lot of business. I checked on prices a while back (both parts and install), and their prices seemed to be higher than most. Can't really speak to customer service, but probably a place I...
Probably the same % of females that purchase Wranglers ;) Mostly moms around me who drive Wranglers.
The first editions are already spoken for. Pretty sure you can still find a brand new LE Gladiator...more than a year later.
6.4 would be good enough for me. But could you imagine a WranglerHawk (copyright pending)?! Then again that probably would be a wee bit dangerous running around naked. Still would be pretty cool embarrassing a Stang at a stoplight hehe.
FCA also has the 6.2 and 6.4, which have been out for several years. The 392 is the 6.4L. Thus Jeep has access to it. I would love a Hellcat Wrangler. Nom nom.
My only concern is longevity and complexity. Not a stranger to forced induction and big powa, but there is a negative long term. Plus I think NA engines are just smoother. Right now weāre seeing a lot of small displacement turbo engines having issues. The early Ecoboosts did as well. Seems like...