Sponsored

ARB rear with reused trak-loc front LSD

  • Thread starter Deleted member 47279
  • Start date
  • Watchers 1

Deleted member 47279

So hear me out. ARB RD245 in the rear, and take the Trak-lok thats currently in it, rebuild the clutchpack since im already in it, and put it in my front M210. that way i can turn in 4WD with minimal wheel hop. and still have serious traction. thoughts? this is on 21 sport diesel with 3.73 gears and trak-lok antispin in the rear from factory.
Sponsored

 

sass JT

Banned
Banned
First Name
Bryan
Joined
Jun 12, 2019
Threads
31
Messages
1,688
Reaction score
2,896
Location
Colorado
Website
youtube.com
Vehicle(s)
2020 Jeep Gladiator Rubicon
Build Thread
Link
Occupation
MWD
No offense but it won’t work. Different axles/cases.

Worse you don’t want a lsd up front
 every time you would turn your vehicle front axle would lock and you would bounce/jerk around.

I’m not an exact expert so I’ll let the axle guys school us from here
 
OP
OP

Deleted member 47279

No offense but it won’t work. Different axles/cases.

Worse you don’t want a lsd up front
 every time you would turn your vehicle front axle would lock and you would bounce/jerk around.
so how does ARB RD245 fit both? i know the M210 and M220 are different, but why would it not work? also with lockers on in 4wd it would bounce anyways. i only use 4WD if i need it while wheelin.
 

JeepOfTheseus

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 26, 2021
Threads
56
Messages
1,047
Reaction score
1,870
Location
Bay Area
Vehicle(s)
Jeep Gladiator
No offense but it won’t work. Different axles/cases.

Worse you don’t want a lsd up front
 every time you would turn your vehicle front axle would lock and you would bounce/jerk around.

I’m not an exact expert so I’ll let the axle guys school us from here
Not sure that it would lock/bind...because if that were the case, wouldn't that be a problem in the rear? Turning still makes the rear wheels rotate at different speeds, too. In any case, front axle should never really be engaged on surfaces with high traction anyways - you'd get binding regardless of LSD or lockers.

On the original question, one thought to keep in mind is that an LSD essentially becomes an open-diff (i.e. useless) if one wheel is completely in the air. And as I just mentioned, front axle isn't/shouldn't be engaged on normal surfaces, so you wouldn't be using your LSD for majority of your driving - which means you also lose the benefit of having it in the rear in the first place: better traction during normal driving but with slippery/wet conditions.

I opted for leaving my LSD in the rear and put an Eaton locker up front, in part for these reasons.
 

Rusty PW

Well-Known Member
First Name
Russ
Joined
Jan 10, 2022
Threads
37
Messages
11,441
Reaction score
30,502
Location
Fayette Nam, Pennsyltucky
Website
www.youtube.com
Vehicle(s)
'22 JTRD, '11 370Z Nismo, '07 Honda VFR
Build Thread
Link
Occupation
Muff Diver
My old '76 Chevy 4x4 had LSD's front and rear. My '90 Nissan V6 Hardbody 4X4 had a Detroit locker in the rear with a Quaife LSD in the front. Put over 100,000 miles on each one.
 

Sponsored

ShadowsPapa

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bill
Joined
Oct 12, 2019
Threads
247
Messages
40,497
Reaction score
54,011
Location
Runnells, Iowa
Vehicle(s)
'25 JTMX, '23 JLU 4xe, '82 SX4, '73 Javelin
Occupation
Retired auto mechanic, frmr gov't ntwrk security admin
Vehicle Showcase
3
No offense but it won’t work. Different axles/cases.

Worse you don’t want a lsd up front
 every time you would turn your vehicle front axle would lock and you would bounce/jerk around.

I’m not an exact expert so I’ll let the axle guys school us from here
It won't lock. It depends on a torque difference to squeeze the clutches together and limit the speed difference.
With nothing driving the front axles (meaning if it's in 2wd) it should actually be ok. Worse case, tight corners may take more effort.
Since the carrier wouldn't be turning in 2wd, there shouldn't be torque applied to squeeze the clutch pack.

In 4 wheel drive - could be a bit more fun.
 

rharr

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 6, 2021
Threads
29
Messages
2,041
Reaction score
2,801
Location
Tucson, AZ
Vehicle(s)
21 JTRD 3" RKK lift, (former) 95 XJ 5sp 8" lift
The FAD will keep the front axle disconnected in 2wd until shifted to 4wd. So wheel chatter shouldn't be an issue. Until in 4wd and then no different then a ruby locked probably better since the LSD will give.

About using a rear in the front, not sure, rotation direction might matter.
 

ShadowsPapa

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bill
Joined
Oct 12, 2019
Threads
247
Messages
40,497
Reaction score
54,011
Location
Runnells, Iowa
Vehicle(s)
'25 JTMX, '23 JLU 4xe, '82 SX4, '73 Javelin
Occupation
Retired auto mechanic, frmr gov't ntwrk security admin
Vehicle Showcase
3
better since the LSD will give.

About using a rear in the front, not sure, rotation direction might matter.
Yes, it shouldn't be a big deal because how hard a LSD locks depends on the torque applied, and the wheel speed difference.
I've not torn these apart, but if it's like others that use a clutch pack, it's the action of the beveled gears pushing away from each other. So if it's like what I've had in the past, direction won't matter. But again, I'm basing that on how other designs operate.

Are the carriers different front to rear? The ring gear diameter is the 220 vs 210 but is that just the ring gear, or are the carriers different?
 

Rusty PW

Well-Known Member
First Name
Russ
Joined
Jan 10, 2022
Threads
37
Messages
11,441
Reaction score
30,502
Location
Fayette Nam, Pennsyltucky
Website
www.youtube.com
Vehicle(s)
'22 JTRD, '11 370Z Nismo, '07 Honda VFR
Build Thread
Link
Occupation
Muff Diver
 







Top