ShadowsPapa
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Bill
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2019
- Threads
- 247
- Messages
- 40,440
- Reaction score
- 53,853
- Location
- Runnells, Iowa
- Vehicle(s)
- '25 JTMX, '23 JLU 4xe, '82 SX4, '73 Javelin
- Occupation
- Retired auto mechanic, frmr gov't ntwrk security admin
- Vehicle Showcase
- 3
- Thread starter
- #1
Anyone here like millions of the rest of us - can't get cable, hate satellite for price and other reasons, using a roof mounted TV antenna?
We've always had "antenna TV" for a list of reasons, so this isn't new but for some reason the issues with our current setup are rather new.
The lower channels (5 dot whatever) and sometimes a couple of others, get lost. We live in a low area between hills and are surrounded by trees. So it's possible the growth of the trees over years and the age of our antenna, cable and amp, splitters and so on are contributing factors.
My wife is getting impatient with the reception and I told her I was also tired of it and would look into a better antenna and this time have it professionally installed with whatever we needed for an amp and splitters to get the signal to all of the TVs and our DVR.
But then the question becomes - what antenna will get all channels, in our area, 5 up through 39, how to take that signal and amplify it so it can be split to get to any of 5 TVs in the house (and even the 2 in my shop)
The bulk of the cable dates back to the 90s at least, some likely into the 80s. (now there's a possible issues right there). It's through outside walls so not one bit easy to replace.
And I have an amp in the ceiling of our finished basement that takes the signal and sends it to 4 of the TVs but I have used passive splitters to get to the others.
I've looked up "best roof top antenna" and see a couple that look really great - with the caveat - "not good for lower VHF" which is exactly where we have the most issues - 5 dot whatever.
I can't remember the name or model of the amp - will have to look at it.
And do the radio and TV experts here agree or disagree that older cable installs can be a problem, or is it that the coax will outlive me and I shouldn't worry about it?
We've always had "antenna TV" for a list of reasons, so this isn't new but for some reason the issues with our current setup are rather new.
The lower channels (5 dot whatever) and sometimes a couple of others, get lost. We live in a low area between hills and are surrounded by trees. So it's possible the growth of the trees over years and the age of our antenna, cable and amp, splitters and so on are contributing factors.
My wife is getting impatient with the reception and I told her I was also tired of it and would look into a better antenna and this time have it professionally installed with whatever we needed for an amp and splitters to get the signal to all of the TVs and our DVR.
But then the question becomes - what antenna will get all channels, in our area, 5 up through 39, how to take that signal and amplify it so it can be split to get to any of 5 TVs in the house (and even the 2 in my shop)
The bulk of the cable dates back to the 90s at least, some likely into the 80s. (now there's a possible issues right there). It's through outside walls so not one bit easy to replace.
And I have an amp in the ceiling of our finished basement that takes the signal and sends it to 4 of the TVs but I have used passive splitters to get to the others.
I've looked up "best roof top antenna" and see a couple that look really great - with the caveat - "not good for lower VHF" which is exactly where we have the most issues - 5 dot whatever.
I can't remember the name or model of the amp - will have to look at it.
And do the radio and TV experts here agree or disagree that older cable installs can be a problem, or is it that the coax will outlive me and I shouldn't worry about it?
Sponsored