ShadowsPapa
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Bill
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2019
- Threads
- 247
- Messages
- 40,440
- Reaction score
- 53,853
- Location
- Runnells, Iowa
- Vehicle(s)
- '25 JTMX, '23 JLU 4xe, '82 SX4, '73 Javelin
- Occupation
- Retired auto mechanic, frmr gov't ntwrk security admin
- Vehicle Showcase
- 3
Not disagreeing- but suggesting there are other things behind this - such as - DAs and prosecutors determine whether or not it's worthwhile to bring someone in.We have a lot idiots driving around here with no plates, insurance, etc. because of the "sovereign citizen" and "gubmint bad" nonsense. The police don't seem to care. It's hard to get the cops to even come out to an accident, they usually just say "exchange insurance and sort it out" over the phone.
And like the trooper who was handling the investigation with Dad's case - the sleeping 20 year old, their region used to have several dozen troopers assigned there. Now it's something less than 20 if I recall correctly.
Hashed out the judgement thing with attorneys - not worth it. We'd have been tied up in courts, the time to deal with it (taking time off work, appearing and so on) and when they rent, or have a cheap car, the law says you can't touch a home or a reasonable automobile. (a BMW or Mercedes isn't necessary for getting back and forth to work so you can go after those for example) but a Fusion or Focus - they are allowed one reasonable vehicle and one reasonable home untouched. If they never sell, you get nothing.
We weighed the odds and costs in money and time - it would have been a fair outlay of both and in the end it was a lottery ticket - pay out and likely never recover what you've put into it.
My youngest brother was so PO'd he was arguing and yelling at the lawyer and insurance company and yet as an insurance insider himself for several years - he knew the reality. I swear he'd have tried to literally squeeze it out of them if he thought he could.
What we lack these days is personal responsibility. 100 years ago, 200 years ago - you were held responsible. If you caused someone to lose $200, you had to make up for that loss plus a payment to society in general for your misbehavior. That's gone.
If you couldn't pay the other party back, you were publicly shamed and it was taken out in sweat equity.
A boss years ago had been through a number of college courses in finance and management and he had it right - if there is no consequence you care about, if the consequences are something you are willing to risk or won't harm you badly enough, you will go ahead. If you've never had good or times where you were happy at all, then consequences have no meaning - it's just another day, you've lost nothing.
Sponsored