Benbean66
Well-Known Member
I don't want to hijack this thread, but I just wanted to add some info for those of us who are in the market for this type of setup.
I've been speaking to Steven from Timber Grove, and he took the measurements I gave him of my setup and compared them to his setup. He said with the "2.5" lift" springs (which Clayton springs do run a little taller than that, so I may have closer to 3-3.5" of lift) that his kit would not quite be tall enough to allow full droop. He offered to design a taller stand for the bags to sit on (adding roughly $75 to the price), which would allow the axle to droop at full extension, but it would limit the compression at full stuff. I think with a little air in them, and no "T" fitting (which would prevent air from traveling to the other bag), they would act as bump stops, and prevent damaging the bag due to being compressed too much.
Although a little pricey, I think this seems like the most stable and most durable (I like overbuilding everything) option in regards to adding bags to the rear axle of my JT.
I've been speaking to Steven from Timber Grove, and he took the measurements I gave him of my setup and compared them to his setup. He said with the "2.5" lift" springs (which Clayton springs do run a little taller than that, so I may have closer to 3-3.5" of lift) that his kit would not quite be tall enough to allow full droop. He offered to design a taller stand for the bags to sit on (adding roughly $75 to the price), which would allow the axle to droop at full extension, but it would limit the compression at full stuff. I think with a little air in them, and no "T" fitting (which would prevent air from traveling to the other bag), they would act as bump stops, and prevent damaging the bag due to being compressed too much.
Although a little pricey, I think this seems like the most stable and most durable (I like overbuilding everything) option in regards to adding bags to the rear axle of my JT.
Sponsored
