Sponsored

Axle Ratio Change For Manual Transmission Gladiator.

mrhemi

Active Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2024
Threads
5
Messages
28
Reaction score
46
Location
Great White North
Vehicle(s)
'22 Gladiator Altitude, '06 Liberty LTD CRD (Sold)
Fist of all, I appreciate all of the knowledge shared on this forum.

I do not wish to start another gear ratio change thread as I know there are many already. I have read them and cannot find what I am searching for.

My Gladiator: 2022 Altitude (not a High Altitude). 3.6 Pentastar, 6spd. manual.
We all know the piss poor ratio selections in the supplied Aisin D478 trans. so no need for further debate there. I knew what I was getting into when I bought the Jeep. The clutch recall has recently been performed. Marginal improvement that I commented on in another thread. What I am proposing or inquiring about, for a manual trans Gladiator, has anyone changed from the supplied 3:73 ratio to a 4:10 ratio? My Jeep will not be driven off road much, if at all, so I am looking for an improvement in all around drive-ability. My tire size will remain at the stock (for a Willys) 255/75R17. Since the 3.6 has such a wimpy torque curve, it must be kept above 2000 rpm to have any throttle response. I would much prefer to have a trans with a single OD and more useful ratio selections, but the D478 is what it is. I ran the proposed ratio change through a gear ratio calculator and the results for the 4:10 ratio appear to offer better sizing for my purposes, though not huge. Keep in mind I am not looking for installing larger tires. I have attached a copy of the calculator sheet. The change appears to put the rpm s in the 2000+ range for improvement in torque curve position, without suffering hugely on economy (if at all). This also will give a bit of an improvement in trailer towing (not looking for a weight increase) as well as the ridiculous reverse ratio.

So, has any member done this and can comment on results? Any recommendations on a suitable shop in SW Ontario or the Detroit Michigan area?

My wife and I have 6 manual trans vehicles, 5 that we drive regularly. The Jeep Gladiator is by far the worse combination. The fleet and ranking follows if anyone is interested:
2023 Subaru WRX- pure pleasure to drive, right off the boat.
1969 Dodge Charger R/T- rebuilt a couple of times over the years, but a pure pleasure as well.
2013 Subaru BRZ (supercharged)- it required some external clutch mods and fluid change to get to where it is.
2014 Dodge Challenger SRT CORE- shifter changed to a Barton and a fluid change (which helped a bit). The Barton shifter throw reduction is too excessive as supplied. Barton will not make a longer shifter handle for me so that is a diy project on my plate.
2022 Jeep Gladiator- terrrible, hence the posting.

Thanks in advance.

Cheers,

mrhemi
Sponsored

 

Attachments

Bbannongmu

Well-Known Member
First Name
JTR.Spartacus
Joined
Jan 18, 2020
Threads
34
Messages
2,146
Reaction score
2,531
Location
Earth
Website
m.facebook.com
Vehicle(s)
2020 Jeep Gladiator Rubicon
Build Thread
Link
Occupation
Certified Emergency Manager
Vehicle Showcase
1
Probably not going to hear about many 4.10 gear changes. It’s just not enough to be meaningful and costs the same. My stock manual Rubi was not adequate - should have been 4.56 gears. Easier way might be to find Rubi take off axles and replace them. Good luck ! by the way the stick clutch also sux - I went @Centerforce Clutches and it’s much better !!!
 

Thunderspud

Well-Known Member
First Name
Angus
Joined
Jun 28, 2023
Threads
4
Messages
498
Reaction score
846
Location
Great Smoky Mountains of East Tennessee
Vehicle(s)
2020 Gladiator Rubicon, 2012 Grand Cherokee, 1973 J10, 2021 Mahindra Roxor
Can't comment on the actual swapping of the gears as my Rubicon with the 6spd came with 4.10s from the factory. I believe all of them did. I regularly tow a small (sub 1500lbs) offroad trailer and can't say that I have any real complaints with the MPG or gearing compared to when driving it without the trailer. I don't really notice it back there.

That said, the gear spacing is still gonna be such that 5 and 6 are essentially identical. There is a chart floating around somewhere here that illustrates this.
 

Flyboy2109

Well-Known Member
First Name
Fred
Joined
Dec 17, 2022
Threads
6
Messages
278
Reaction score
367
Location
Washington
Vehicle(s)
2023 Gladiator, 2004 CTS-V, 2001 Tahoe, 1990 Dakot
Occupation
retired Pilot: USCG, Delta, Netjets
Man, do I agree with you, the ratios in this 6 are pretty bad. I never get to sixth...

My 1965 Barracuda with three on the tree was so much better.
My 1990 Dakota 5 speed is so much better
My 2004 Cad CTS V 6 speed Tremec is so much better.

Gotta wonder who chose this POS transmission? I wasn't going to have the auto...but I sure don't like this. Should be a lot tighter for the small displacement. Not good engineering, it is a poor match.
 

Mightytalldude

Well-Known Member
First Name
MTD
Joined
Mar 25, 2019
Threads
2
Messages
1,360
Reaction score
3,350
Location
North of the Mexico border
Vehicle(s)
Un-Sport S
The manual was really "matched" to the Rubicon trim 4:10 axles on stock 32" tires. Any other trim, it's useable, but you better drive it like a sports car, higher revs, and not a truck. I have a Sport S, running 255/85R17 pizza cutter Mickey Thompson, and I'm planning to change to 4:88, plus add some lockers, to help the manual with the 35" tires, and its double overdrive 5th and 6th. That seems to be the best between usability and fuel efficiency.
 

Sponsored

mendiola21

Well-Known Member
First Name
Don
Joined
Apr 28, 2021
Threads
6
Messages
96
Reaction score
139
Location
Saipan, CNMI
Vehicle(s)
Jeep Gladiator Rubicon
Occupation
Active Duty Marine
My 6Speed Rubicon had the upgraded Falken Peak M/Ts from the factory and I did not like those very much either. I think 4.56 would have been the better selection stock with the 6Speed. I did recently go 5.13s with the 37s and they are perfect combination for me.
 

Sandman 4x4

Well-Known Member
First Name
Kevin
Joined
Jul 23, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
689
Reaction score
564
Location
Kissimmee, Florida
Vehicle(s)
2024 Gladiator Sport S
Occupation
Retired. Beach bum.
Fist of all, I appreciate all of the knowledge shared on this forum.

I do not wish to start another gear ratio change thread as I know there are many already. I have read them and cannot find what I am searching for.

My Gladiator: 2022 Altitude (not a High Altitude). 3.6 Pentastar, 6spd. manual.
We all know the piss poor ratio selections in the supplied Aisin D478 trans. so no need for further debate there. I knew what I was getting into when I bought the Jeep. The clutch recall has recently been performed. Marginal improvement that I commented on in another thread. What I am proposing or inquiring about, for a manual trans Gladiator, has anyone changed from the supplied 3:73 ratio to a 4:10 ratio? My Jeep will not be driven off road much, if at all, so I am looking for an improvement in all around drive-ability. My tire size will remain at the stock (for a Willys) 255/75R17. Since the 3.6 has such a wimpy torque curve, it must be kept above 2000 rpm to have any throttle response. I would much prefer to have a trans with a single OD and more useful ratio selections, but the D478 is what it is. I ran the proposed ratio change through a gear ratio calculator and the results for the 4:10 ratio appear to offer better sizing for my purposes, though not huge. Keep in mind I am not looking for installing larger tires. I have attached a copy of the calculator sheet. The change appears to put the rpm s in the 2000+ range for improvement in torque curve position, without suffering hugely on economy (if at all). This also will give a bit of an improvement in trailer towing (not looking for a weight increase) as well as the ridiculous reverse ratio.

So, has any member done this and can comment on results? Any recommendations on a suitable shop in SW Ontario or the Detroit Michigan area?

My wife and I have 6 manual trans vehicles, 5 that we drive regularly. The Jeep Gladiator is by far the worse combination. The fleet and ranking follows if anyone is interested:
2023 Subaru WRX- pure pleasure to drive, right off the boat.
1969 Dodge Charger R/T- rebuilt a couple of times over the years, but a pure pleasure as well.
2013 Subaru BRZ (supercharged)- it required some external clutch mods and fluid change to get to where it is.
2014 Dodge Challenger SRT CORE- shifter changed to a Barton and a fluid change (which helped a bit). The Barton shifter throw reduction is too excessive as supplied. Barton will not make a longer shifter handle for me so that is a diy project on my plate.
2022 Jeep Gladiator- terrrible, hence the posting.

Thanks in advance.

Cheers,

mrhemi
Yea it’s posts like this that I had no problem ponying up for the automatic 8 speed, I find very well suited to driving comfort, performance and mileage, with the Adaptive Cruise Control System, I can set it as close to the vehicle in front, at my desired overall speed and as traffic builds and slows, so does my Gladiator at a set distance, in long stop and go traffic, as long as the stop is no more than 5 seconds the system automatically follows the car ahead at a pace of two car lengths. Very safely and not a foot on any peddle or hand on any shift! The best system I’ve ever had in long stop and go traffic, that actually maximizes the mileage in the worst conditions.
 
OP
OP

mrhemi

Active Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2024
Threads
5
Messages
28
Reaction score
46
Location
Great White North
Vehicle(s)
'22 Gladiator Altitude, '06 Liberty LTD CRD (Sold)
Thanks to those who replied. much as I expected, no one will do a swap to a 4.10 ratio from 3.73.

What I should have also asked was anyone's experience with a Gladiator that came with 4.10 axles (Rubicon?)
 

Flyboy2109

Well-Known Member
First Name
Fred
Joined
Dec 17, 2022
Threads
6
Messages
278
Reaction score
367
Location
Washington
Vehicle(s)
2023 Gladiator, 2004 CTS-V, 2001 Tahoe, 1990 Dakot
Occupation
retired Pilot: USCG, Delta, Netjets
The manual was really "matched" to the Rubicon trim 4:10 axles on stock 32" tires. Any other trim, it's useable, but you better drive it like a sports car, higher revs, and not a truck. I have a Sport S, running 255/85R17 pizza cutter Mickey Thompson, and I'm planning to change to 4:88, plus add some lockers, to help the manual with the 35" tires, and its double overdrive 5th and 6th. That seems to be the best between usability and fuel efficiency.
I have a question: since I have the same Sport S outfit as you do. Does the 4:88 gear set go right into the Sport S pumpkin/housing or does one simply have to buy a whole rear end and housing?

Thanks, I am on the learning curve...
 

Mightytalldude

Well-Known Member
First Name
MTD
Joined
Mar 25, 2019
Threads
2
Messages
1,360
Reaction score
3,350
Location
North of the Mexico border
Vehicle(s)
Un-Sport S
I have a question: since I have the same Sport S outfit as you do. Does the 4:88 gear set go right into the Sport S pumpkin/housing or does one simply have to buy a whole rear end and housing? Thanks, I am on the learning curve...
Same housing. Reason why I'm waiting, is to do lockers and gearing at same time, save labor costs.
 

Mulinomafia

Active Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2024
Threads
6
Messages
36
Reaction score
124
Location
Oregon
Vehicle(s)
2023 jt rubicon
I had 5.13 with 40’s and a MT. Switched to 5.38 asap.
Sponsored

 
 







Top