MF Comics
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Mike
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2018
- Threads
- 11
- Messages
- 328
- Reaction score
- 375
- Location
- Eatontown, NJ
- Vehicle(s)
- '21 2dr Manual Bronco
Blame Canada the EPA, their strict rules led to this
Sponsored
I think it all boils down to cost savings on research and design. I’m a die hard Buy American guy but Stellantis hasn’t exactly embodied the reliability of the old day Dodge / Jeep vehicles. They needed a diesel that would be relatively light and have a low enough profile to fit under the hood. They found an Italian VM Motori engine that fit their parameters. It’s pretty close to the one used in the Grand Cherokee that has proven reliable enough to usually survive the warranty period. I believe they expected similar performance from this diesel. Last just long enough so that you have to trade it in when you hit a position of equity on the loan.Wonder what the benefit was of this super complex V engine vs a 4 or 5 cyl diesel? Too tall? Certainly not balance.
The v is super duper quiet though for a diesel.
But why build a v diesel in the first place. It doesn’t save money in design or execution. My understanding, the only two things v gets you is shorter and by shorter, stiffer crank shaft. No benefit other than shape.I think it all boils down to cost savings on research and design.
Rant over lol
Great question. That I cannot answer. I would assume it has to do with trying to maintain similar mounting points for the motor mounts and electrical wiring. Transmission length and driveshaft length. We need a Chrysler engineer to answer that one. I assume they saved a penny .But why build a v diesel in the first place. It doesn’t save money in design or execution. My understanding, the only two things v gets you is shorter and by shorter, stiffer crank shaft. No benefit other than shape.
I’m only 50. I’m not old enough to have experienced a well built Chrysler or reliable jeep product. I got into Jeeps at the end of amc. My cj5 had that amc v8 in it that seemed to hold together well… as well it should at like … 10hp/litre
I have heard that the recall fix is just to pop open the pump inspect for metal. No metal = leave it and sign off. Metal = new pump with some improvements for wear surfaces. This was per a service advisor at a ram dealer. Nothing formal either way.Maybe this is a sign they actually have the fuel pump fix FINALLY.
Does this mean the next powerplant is ready for production?
Hope it's the I-6TT w/ a hybrid option.
Semantics but…. Chrysler hasn’t been around for a long time.Great question. That I cannot answer. I would assume it has to do with trying to maintain similar mounting points for the motor mounts and electrical wiring. Transmission length and driveshaft length. We need a Chrysler engineer to answer that one. I assume they saved a penny .
One sedan and a minivan would be very upset to hear you say that.Semantics but…. Chrysler hasn’t been around for a long time.
Hey, just because they can’t read, doesn’t mean the charger challenger crowd doesn’t exist. They’re a lot like the Altima crowd… but with union jobs instead of none.One sedan and a minivan would be very upset to hear you say that.
Seriously though... Plymouth, Mercury, Oldsmobile, Saturn, and Pontiac had more and more interesting models when they got axed.
Seriously what is the CDJR strategy? C and D are figments of a fevered imagination at this point.
I’ll paint pen mine when it goes in. Thought this seems silly- anyone can undo the two torx bolts that hold the regulator on and see….. but if your seeing metal there, h the a half Butt screen that’s surrounding it isn’t containing anything- so the injectors are going to be toast anyway. ??‍I have heard that the recall fix is just to pop open the pump inspect for metal. No metal = leave it and sign off. Metal = new pump with some improvements for wear surfaces. This was per a service advisor at a ram dealer. Nothing formal either way.
Space savings. The V design saves 12 - 18 inches minimum.But why build a v diesel in the first place. It doesn’t save money in design or execution. My understanding, the only two things v gets you is shorter and by shorter, stiffer crank shaft. No benefit other than shape.
I’m only 50. I’m not old enough to have experienced a well built Chrysler or reliable jeep product. I got into Jeeps at the end of amc. My cj5 had that amc v8 in it that seemed to hold together well… as well it should at like … 10hp/litre
4” bore x 6 = 24” plus coolant passages, iron liners and accessories can quickly result in a 36” long engine.Over a 4cyl? I guess it’s not designed for this market or vehicle… so it’s hard to imagine what concerns they were looking at.
I imagine smaller cylinders make it’s quieter and smoother at idle given the proper balancing.