chorky
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Chad
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2022
- Threads
- 161
- Messages
- 3,150
- Reaction score
- 3,318
- Location
- Montana
- Website
- www.youtube.com
- Vehicle(s)
- '22JTR, '06 LJ, '06 TJ GE
- Build Thread
- Link
- Occupation
- GIS Specialist
How big is that battery under the seat? I wonder if they will opt for a bed mounted battery at the cost of bed space instead considering the heavier weight and more power needed in the Gladiator compared to the JL.ce the problem the update is for - perhaps there are some on the internet with that complaint, I've just not seen any yet, but we had ours flashed just to be sure since it's my wife's primary vehicle - and no way I wanted to chance non-working
Yeah but one really cannot claim that much 'renewable' energy because to be truthful a person really needs to look at the big picture. In other words, where did those 'renewables' come from? Such as wind turbines. What materials are needed in their manufacturer, transport, install, maintenance - it all matters. Where is the electricity from that powers the computers for the engineers to do their designing? What about office spaces, commenting employees, etc... Looking at something at the end point is really a bad idea because depending on variables, a person can make any pile of poo look like a diamond with enough processes down the line. Saying California's energy is not from greenhouse gasses is flat out wrong if you look into the details deep enough. What if, just saying if because I dont know, the energy needed to create said 'renewable' energy devices was significantly worse than the amount of energy it would ever create in its lifetime... Case in point, the Berkley pit in Butte. It's bad, real bad. But if someone way down stream in Noxon did a water sample they might say something like "well now all that billions of dollars worth of water treatment is doing great, theres next to no sign of contamination here", but you see the fallacy in that, and would you want to be drinking that water despite the 'numbers' being just fine? I doubt it. There are also equal problems caused by all these 'renewable' sources that are simply out of sight out of mind. Kinda like diamond mines in Russia, oh and this super large one in Canada. At the end of the day, the only true method to reduce consumption and pollution is to just have/use/do less. Because 250 years from now someone might say something like, "man, I wish those idiots in 2020 realized that 500 billion wind turbines would screw up the worlds wind patterns and now our weather is all sorts of jacked....", total coal is 2.xx% which include import. CA produce 0.13% from coal. Yes, miniscule. We do get a high percentage from natural gas. But it's way less than half at around 36%. Most of our energy is from renewables and non green house gas. Also, we produce more than 2/3 of hour electricity. These numbers will continue to shift more toward renewable over the next decades. At the same time, coal mine numbers are shrinking. Despite claims that "The
I mean sure, maybe Ca has it right, but without perspective on a larger scale (which nobody truly has a handle on) you don't know what you don't know, and all that 'renewable' energy could be far far worse than the alternative.
Sponsored