jac04
Well-Known Member
I don't have a LRF tire, so let's consider a LRE tire.
If a LRF tire "Will be damn near a run-flat tire" (according to Griz, see above), then an LRE should still not have all that much sidewall deflection on a relatively lightweight vehicle, right?
So see if any of the previously posted nonsense is true, I went out to the garage and deflated one of the rear tires on my JK to 2-3 psi (I didn't want it to go completely flat). The tires are 255/85R17 MT Baja Boss AT which are Load Range E.
This tire is capable of carrying 3195 lbs at 80 psi.
The picture below is on the back of my 2014 JK 2-door, soft top, with the back seat removed and about 1/2 a tank of gas. Curb weight with a hard top and rear seat is 4132 lbs. Although weight distribution is not 50/50 F/R, I will assume it is to be conservative. This tire therefore has 4132/4 = 1033 lbs of load on it.
Why is this LRE tire so flat if the sidewall carries the majority of the load and the tire is only loaded to about 30% of its rated capacity?
If a LRF tire "Will be damn near a run-flat tire" (according to Griz, see above), then an LRE should still not have all that much sidewall deflection on a relatively lightweight vehicle, right?
So see if any of the previously posted nonsense is true, I went out to the garage and deflated one of the rear tires on my JK to 2-3 psi (I didn't want it to go completely flat). The tires are 255/85R17 MT Baja Boss AT which are Load Range E.
This tire is capable of carrying 3195 lbs at 80 psi.
The picture below is on the back of my 2014 JK 2-door, soft top, with the back seat removed and about 1/2 a tank of gas. Curb weight with a hard top and rear seat is 4132 lbs. Although weight distribution is not 50/50 F/R, I will assume it is to be conservative. This tire therefore has 4132/4 = 1033 lbs of load on it.
Why is this LRE tire so flat if the sidewall carries the majority of the load and the tire is only loaded to about 30% of its rated capacity?
Sponsored