bleda2002
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #31
Fully agree on pure BEVs. That's where phevs and fuel cells are the other 2 technologies that will carry where bev doesn't work. I don't see all of us driving pure BEVs, they're great at what they're great at, but they have limitations. Phevs and fuel cells though carry most of the advantages of a BEV but with out a lot of limitations (well hydrogen infrastructure still sucks but that could be built out fairly easily like building more gas stations). I'm not interested in a BEV, but PHEV would suit my needs just fine as to me I see it as a power adder first.I've owned an electric car for eight years. They are low maintenance and nice to drive. The limited range has always been an issue. The only things I've had to replace are tires, wiper blades, and the 12v battery. The big battery was replaced near the end of the warranty about five years ago. Most people that have had an electric car will be happy to tell you how great they are.
The problem with electric cars is the high environmental cost to produce them, and the lack of infrastructure to support them. If you don't have private space you control, to put in a charging station, the car becomes difficult to own and use. The current grid setup will not support everyone plugging in at night to charge.
Electric has always been treated as a niche market, with limited support except where government mandated. Tesla spent the money to build infrastructure and make electric a main stream option. For most people, though, the cost to obtain a Tesla is just too high.
Also Tesla reported their new battery plant is bringing costs so far down a 25k stripper ev is now realistic and the model 3 is trending similar to average car values. As more manufacturers get in on this and battery costs continue to come down the tipping point for PHEV/bev/fuel cell is coming closer and closer imo. Once they can swap the 15 year old batteries for sub 10k it will be really hard to argue against them for 90% of people's needs.
Sponsored