Yes it will reduce air flow. If someone would send me a small piece ( 6in by 6in ) I will put on my flow bench and post what % it reduces air flow.I'd like to get an American flag insert, but don't want to if it will need removed later when I get my supercharger. Did anyone know if the reduce airflow?
My wife has a grill insert on her Sahara. It is not a matter of thickness it is a matter of area that is reduced by the size of the holes in it. Just by looking I would guess at least a 35% or 40% air reduction. No big deal for a stock engine but for a SC with inter cooler engine, not so good.2nd issue, will it effect the ability in insert the SC cooler? Not sure how the inserts mount in or how thick they are?
Send me a piece of it and let me measure the flow reduction.It was a big deal for me on my JK. The fan was running constantly when offroad in 4 low. I took it off and threw it away. Lesson learned.
40% reduction in air flow ? Not a big deal ?My wife has a grill insert on her Sahara. It is not a matter of thickness it is a matter of area that is reduced by the size of the holes in it. Just by looking I would guess at least a 35% or 40% air reduction. No big deal for a stock engine but for a SC with inter cooler engine, not so good.
If you've watched some of the wind tunnel with smoke videos, the air going through the engine bay is carefully calculated and routed in SOME vehicles. There are some where it's directed to under the vehicle for very specific reasons.40% reduction in air flow ? Not a big deal ?
I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that is not a reasoblnable conclusion.
Change anything in a mechanical device by 40% and expect it to be no big deal ? Nope.
Especially cooling.
Not a mechanic, no data to cite, and I could be wrong. But I'm an engineer and this simply sounds way off.
I'd never mess with airflow. In any way on any engine. It was designed as it is for a reason.
If you live in the Arctic, please ignore my statements.
The 35 or 40% I was speaking of is only a guess based on the visual of the restriction. The only way to know for sure is with good data from measuring the air flow. I do have the capability to do the measurement, but I don't have a sample. What I do know is there are a lot of jeeps running around here with the inserts. I did not notice any temp increase after the insert was added on my wife's JL Hers is stock and only runs on easy trails.40% reduction in air flow ? Not a big deal ?
I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that is not a reasoblnable conclusion.
Change anything in a mechanical device by 40% and expect it to be no big deal ? Nope.
Especially cooling.
Not a mechanic, no data to cite, and I could be wrong. But I'm an engineer and this simply sounds way off.
I'd never mess with airflow. In any way on any engine. It was designed as it is for a reason.
If you live in the Arctic, please ignore my statements.
Reduced airflow = reduced cooling thresholds and capacity.The 35 or 40% I was speaking of is only a guess based on the visual of the restriction. The only way to know for sure is with good data from measuring the air flow. I do have the capability to do the measurement, but I don't have a sample. What I do know is there are a lot of jeeps running around here with the inserts. I did not notice any temp increase after the insert was added on my wife's JL Hers is stock and only runs on easy trails.
I agree to all that. I will not put one in mine either.Reduced airflow = reduced cooling thresholds and capacity.
If there was not an engine temp increase, that the OAT outside air temp was low enough to still stay ahead of the engine cooling requirements.
All good. Until the threshold is crossed and the temp begins to climb.
The jeep has a good cooling system with a lot of "headroom" and likely masks the effect of the reduced airflow. Until it can't.
It likely can in Colorado in the spring. I'd be very surprised if it still could in Arizona in July.
People do a lot of stuff. Most don't understand the ramifications of said changes.
As I said. If you live in a cold place, have at it.