Not exactly, if the OP is using the truck as intended(within the limits) then it possibly could be a warranty issue. Also, look at the timeline he has for various issues... I would think it is hard for anyone legally to claim they all came from the initial mud incident.Sounds about right, I mean not trying to be on FCA's side but if you caked it in mud and killed the alternator and done some electrical damage then not sure why you would think the warranty would cover that. Be about like sticking 40's on a jeep and then your ball joints going out at 8,000 miles and then trying to say FCA puts crappy ball joints on.
It's not intended to be buried up in mud, you can use it for that but it's not intended for that, two different things. All could of most definitely came from the same problem but maybe could of taken longer for issues to come up. Kinda like buying a car that's had flood damage. It may not show initially, but a few months or even a year later you could run into issues. Mud would be no different. If you went through water to deep and hydrolocked your engine, I promise your warranty wouldn't cover that, I don't see this being any different. It's going to be a long hard fight on this one and I see it probably going in FCA's favor. It sucks for sure.Not exactly, if the OP is using the truck as intended(within the limits) then it possibly could be a warranty issue. Also, look at the timeline he has for various issues... I would think it is hard for anyone legally to claim they all came from the initial mud incident.
Well, they (Dana) did put crappy ball joints in it...Sounds about right, I mean not trying to be on FCA's side but if you caked it in mud and killed the alternator and done some electrical damage then not sure why you would think the warranty would cover that. Be about like sticking 40's on a jeep and then your ball joints going out at 8,000 miles and then trying to say FCA puts crappy ball joints on.
If you sunk it deep enough in mud to kill the alternator all bets are off, after all it is pretty well protected and on the top front of the engine. The rear locker sensor could be unrelated and a common problem but based on how you used it your use could have caused it as well.So my rear locker sensor going out in November (which is a super common problem) is because I went through mud in July??
That is what I was wondering. Where are the pics.Got any pictures of this Jeep immediately after the mud “plowing”? Without context, how could we possibly form opinions or recommendations? For all we know this Jeep was sunken.
I must have gotten really lucky with mine when I drove through 3" of slop mud.you got me...I have since updated the post. Thank you for keeping me honest.
Plowed it through the mud a bunch of times. It was covered in mud for sure and killed the alternator.
Beat me to it - that's a common known issue. Several forum members have had this exact same thing happen and yes, they replace the entire rear differential assembly to fix it.If you sunk it deep enough in mud to kill the alternator all bets are off, after all it is pretty well protected and on the top front of the engine. The rear locker sensor could be unrelated and a common problem but based on how you used it your use could have caused it as well.
Jeeps are built to go off road, but they aren’t boats. The OP needs to provide evidence to the jury here. Without that, it’s all hearsay evidence, which is inadmissible. The plaintiff may proceed...What is with all the negativity here???
He bought a JEEP (FFS) ... A JEEP! It is made to go off-road, and spoiler alert, there is MUD OFF-ROAD! I'm sorry, but if going through mud stops the alternator from working and/or causes other issues, then it IS a warranty issue, as the JEEP was not designed for purpose!
OP - get a lawyer and get this sorted ASAP. As others have said, document every commination (date, time, person spoken to, gist of the conversation).