Sponsored

6-Speed 4.10s with 37s Need Some Help

seven30

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tom
Joined
Apr 12, 2021
Threads
10
Messages
664
Reaction score
534
Location
central texas/ south colorado
Vehicle(s)
2021 JTM 6spd, 2001 Cherokee, 1992 Comanche
Occupation
Programer
Hey thanks!
This is nice: gear calculator http://www.grimmjeeper.com/gears.html

Enter stock data and copy to right side then model different axle and tire on left to compare

With manual 6spd 4.10 (stock tires) at 70mph 4th gear still misses the power band at 2878 rpm but 4.56 axle gives 3281 rpm in 4th right where Id like it to be for passing.

70 in 6th goes from 2072 to 2362 which I expect to have small real impact on mpg especially considering fewer downshifts will be needed.

Now to find a good regearing thread.....
Sponsored

 

Geoarch

Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Feb 3, 2022
Threads
26
Messages
1,370
Reaction score
1,235
Location
Albuquerque, NM
Website
swxrflab.net
Vehicle(s)
2024 JTR, Bright White AT; 2022 JTR MT (traded)
Occupation
geoarchaeologist (retired)
I don't have larger tires or 4.10 gears. My Overland with manual is stock. So I can't help with the specifics you are asking for.

However, having driven many different vehicles with MT in my life, I think it is more just getting the feel for how much torque you have for given speed and acceleration rate. You will learn by doing.
I would agree. The engine (and tach) tell you what's right. My Tacoma shifts at different points than the JTR since the ratios and tire sizes are so different 31s versus 34s.
 

JD101

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jon
Joined
Nov 28, 2021
Threads
6
Messages
151
Reaction score
189
Location
Mi
Vehicle(s)
2021 Gladiator Rubicon , 2021 JLU
I'd go 5.13 . It's like having 4.88s with a bit of reserve for hills, windy days , towing , or hauling . Your clutch will thank you also .
 

seven30

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tom
Joined
Apr 12, 2021
Threads
10
Messages
664
Reaction score
534
Location
central texas/ south colorado
Vehicle(s)
2021 JTM 6spd, 2001 Cherokee, 1992 Comanche
Occupation
Programer
I would agree. The engine (and tach) tell you what's right. My Tacoma shifts at different points than the JTR since the ratios and tire sizes are so different 31s versus 34s.
The real issue is starting off from a stop. The dual-mass clutch makes it real easy to stall.
 

Geoarch

Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Feb 3, 2022
Threads
26
Messages
1,370
Reaction score
1,235
Location
Albuquerque, NM
Website
swxrflab.net
Vehicle(s)
2024 JTR, Bright White AT; 2022 JTR MT (traded)
Occupation
geoarchaeologist (retired)
The real issue is starting off from a stop. The dual-mass clutch makes it real easy to stall.
Hopefully my 45 years with MTs (first in 1967) and the Tacoma with the same type of clutch will ameliorate any issues.
 

Sponsored

NachoRuby

Well-Known Member
First Name
Chad
Joined
Apr 28, 2021
Threads
28
Messages
2,992
Reaction score
4,407
Location
Pennsylvania
Vehicle(s)
'21 JTR , '18 JLU, 73 VW Bug, 97 VW Jetta, all MTs
Dual mass seems to more and more be the norm, which is OK with me for a stock/factory part. It doesn't take long to acclimate to.
 

seven30

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tom
Joined
Apr 12, 2021
Threads
10
Messages
664
Reaction score
534
Location
central texas/ south colorado
Vehicle(s)
2021 JTM 6spd, 2001 Cherokee, 1992 Comanche
Occupation
Programer
Dual mass seems to more and more be the norm, which is OK with me for a stock/factory part. It doesn't take long to acclimate to.
Its not so much the fact that is dual-mass as the particular design details. There are many many variations on the dual-mass clutch. In our case it seems the primary flywheel is lighter than optimal for truck duty. There is some debate about why that is. My take is that the primary flywheel has low inertia to facilitate longer stop/start system life.
Sponsored

 
 



Top