jebiruph
Well-Known Member
The link explains it.Why is it better?
I know there are a few ways to bypass or replace the aux battery, but why is pulling the fuse better?
Just trying to increase my knowledge on this issue.
Sponsored
The link explains it.Why is it better?
I know there are a few ways to bypass or replace the aux battery, but why is pulling the fuse better?
Just trying to increase my knowledge on this issue.
No you weren't!I was referring to the "monty python" clip not the conversation of the thread.
The problem with the above is that the F42 and removing the aux battery ground does not make ESS go away. This has also been discussed ad nauseam around here. People don't understand, they don't get what that method does and does NOT do.This method would still seem to be an easier way. That is what I did several months back. I haven't had any issues. The annoying ESS is gone. The mod cost $0. I guess maybe it costs less than a dollar if you figure in some electric tape and wire ties.
I will completely remove the aux battery when I have an opportunity to dig down in there.
Until your main battery dies LOLWhy bother with the kit? I simply removed the aux batt and put the cables on the main battery, they reach. Problem solved and no worries about the aux batt dying. No follow on problems. Simple is better.
I have an idea for a circuit that would pretty much get rid of the chance of either battery draining the other while sitting. Still thinking through all scenarios, and how practical it would be, ease of installation and so on, but it hit me - is there a solid reason for the batteries to be connected in parallel when just sitting in a garage?My AUX shit the bed and then took the starter battery with it ... I actually DO spend significant time "off grid" and wanted to lessen the chance of being stranded by the AUX. I deleted the AUX a year ago and never looked back. I could care less about the ESS ... it still works as designed.
yeah, i lost interest about 6 posts deep.Page one gave me cancer....they argue about the dumbest things over there..
Probably putting my foot in my mouth responding but my understanding is wiring in parallel adds the mA together from both batteries. Series adds the voltages together. Series would be bad because it's not a 24v system.I have an idea for a circuit that would pretty much get rid of the chance of either battery draining the other while sitting. Still thinking through all scenarios, and how practical it would be, ease of installation and so on, but it hit me - is there a solid reason for the batteries to be connected in parallel when just sitting in a garage?
ESS doesn't bother me at all. I have had enough cars over the years with it's just the way it is.The problem with the above is that the F42 and removing the aux battery ground does not make ESS go away. This has also been discussed ad nauseam around here. People don't understand, they don't get what that method does and does NOT do.
Claims that it disables ESS are incorrect. (it works at least 6 times as has been reported by people who have done the fuse pull and who have an otherwise perfectly working truck with functional ESS)
If ESS isn't working, your PCM believes you have some other issues with that truck. There are over 2 dozen things that control whether or not ESS will work - likely part of your truck is constantly failing other tests.
Removing F42 ONLY prevents the PCM from opening the PCR to check the aux battery. If the fuse is pulled, the PCR can't open but the PCM doesn't know this and sees the main battery voltage and assumes there's an aux battery there because the main battery is connected to the N1 through the PCR that can't open.
This is what happens when non-electricians assume and pass along erroneous information and why the OP is so confused.
ESS isn't annoying to me, it saves fuel, and it's a great troubleshooting tool as if it's not working, you have troubles with the truck somewhere.
I suspect this is thread number 153 on the topic.
In parallel you have a larger pool to draw from - yes, in a sense a larger battery.Probably putting my foot in my mouth responding but my understanding is wiring in parallel adds the mA together from both batteries. Series adds the voltages together. Series would be bad because it's not a 24v system.
In my field of work we use teh 12v7aH battery. our system wire them parallel. This give us 14aH to operate on. Essentially providing more duty cycles of the system. You are almost making a deep cycle battery by creating a larger amp pool to draw from. Perhaps having the little battery on the side give just enough extra amps to operate the doohicky responsible for teh ESS. Who knows. Bypassing it may cause premature battery failure by using more than the alternator can compensate for or maybe every killing the alternator sooner. I just hit 40k and have literally no electrical issues at all (fingers crossed)
Please correct me or elaborate![]()
That's a smart move.Thanks for all the info!!!
I think I'm just going to leave it alone!