Then King/Fox as long as you are talking 2.5s. Icon and Falcon are both digressive valved while Fox and King are linear trending slightly toward progressive.Any reason to choose one over the other. Will see a lot of washboard roads and forest service roads.
Thanks for the info. I had looked at the Evo 2.5 lift with king shocks but wasn't sure I wanted as much lift as people were getting. I had also looked at putting on the mojave shocks but if i ever wanted 37s they won't work with a lift. Probably better to go the evo route......so hard to decide.Then King/Fox as long as you are talking 2.5s. Icon and Falcon are both digressive valved while Fox and King are linear trending slightly toward progressive.
Digressive is going to be stiff with quick hits while doing less great at dampening soft hits... On road, towing, and on slower trails that have sudden drops, this is a great thing. The trade off is that they are aggressive and harsh over washboard roads while not having enough dampening for slow hits like larger whoops. It's a solid axle truck so it's unlikely you're hauling nine kinds of ass over whoops anyway.
Linear/Progressive shocks are going to be much more compliant with quick hits so they are softer on road and over washboard roads. Their valving also allows for better management of large, slower movements like large whoops but they don't have as great of management for large, quick hits. This can, however, be managed with air bumps which means you're only sacrificing a bit of on-road tightness. Fox makes a great air bump kit that fits inside the spring perch and uses the stock bump location... just need to trim a bit off the factory bump mount and it slides right in.
No matter what you choose, get them valved for your weight and springs - it makes all the difference in the world and it's a lot easier to find a King, Fox, or Bilstein dealer who can do it over Falcon and Icon.
Ok, Falcon SP2 3.3 adjustable shocks just arrived. I ordered them on Black Friday weekend from Clayton Off road together with their 3.5" Overland Plus kit. Timing seems to be pretty good. Clayton told me today that my lift kit should ship this Friday. So, it seems Teraflex and Clayton are running about the same wait time.hjdca let me know how you like the Falcon 3.3s when you get them on. I had heard they are stiffer then some but that they soften up a bit once there broken in. I keep considering going that route but was concerned how they would handle the washboard stuff.
For me, it is not so much the endurance issue, but, more that I like the adjustability that you can do based on terrain and speed -- ie. that you can do between higher speed Dunes/desert, street, and rock crawling. It is sort of like having rock crawling, desert shock, and street shock all in one.On Teraflex’s site they say having the reservoir on the body provides better performance than remote reservoir shocks. They sure look nice.
Curious if these type of shocks are really needed for the majority of use they see, would a regular Fox shock or Bilstein 5100 overheat and would the performance be noticeably degraded in normal use? At what point is a shock like these needed?
It's not a difference in performance on high end shocks. The hose bulging is what they're probably referring to and it's just not an issue on good shocks.On Teraflex’s site they say having the reservoir on the body provides better performance than remote reservoir shocks. They sure look nice.
Curious if these type of shocks are really needed for the majority of use they see, would a regular Fox shock or Bilstein 5100 overheat and would the performance be noticeably degraded in normal use? At what point is a shock like these needed?
I finally received all the parts - Clayton 3.5" overland plus kit and the SP2 3.3 Falcon Adjustable shocks. I plan to do the install this weekend.Any updates?? How do you like them on the street?? Thanks!!