Radio Guy
Well-Known Member
I like to present facts and I don't have any documented data on the difference in performance between a UHF pud and other UHF antennas at the moment. I have tried them and have noticed the reduction in performance and its not subtle. Most of my use is mobile to repeaters and not much if any simplex use on UHF.I took it as it works "great" for him.... I didn't take it as a disservice. I guess if a branch is going to take out the antenna, its probably going after the mirror too.... From what I've seen, that placement seems to be a very popular...
In your experience, what would you think the range of these ghost "pud" antennas achieve in a moderately wooded area ? Do you think they would suffice in a trail convoy or an open road trip.
I have the MXTA26 whip, but its mounted like @sharpsicle , but on the passenger side. I do not really have a good way to test real world performance and would rather not be testing and be "in the need" at the same time. Any suggestions on testing ?
I did pay more attention to the VHF pud antennas where I compared one to a basic 1/4 wave whip noting signal strength from several 2m repeaters and multiple NOAA weather transmitters and there was a very noticeable degradation going from the pud to the whip. Driving around I noticed lots of flutter and dead spots on the pud where the whip was virtually noise free. This was with a roof mount on a different vehicle and both antennas tested on the same mount.
I can say for close range convoy or down the highway up to a few miles line of sight on GMRS a pud antenna mounted below hood level should be heard for the most part. Thick foliage and dense trees attenuate UHF signals so in a hilly area with dense trees there will be a point where the pud antenna will fade out and other types will still be heard. This will also depend on vehicle orientation if the pud antenna is mounted below the hood where the vehicle body will block or attenuate the signal in some directions.
Sponsored