COmtnbiker
Well-Known Member
From a Consumer Reports towing test and some other reports from the forum, apparently the Mojave tows terribly compared to the Rubicon due to the suspension (if you plan to tow).
Sponsored
That would be a awesome Jeep but I would want to call it the Mojicon Max.Ok I've watched video comparisons, read countless back and forth discussions about this thing. I know what I want.
A MORUBIMAX.
I don't think Jeep will do it because they are Chicken!
I think it's obvious what everyone wants is the Mojicon MaXtreme Recon 392 available in manual or automatic. Not that most of us could afford such a vehicleThat would be a awesome Jeep but I would want to call it the Mojicon Max.
The extra front axle weight of the diesel may be a bit of a liability ripping through desert terrain as well.Your answers are Diesel and transfer cases. While the extra cooling the mojave gets can be added to any model with a towing package already, and the frame reinforcement could easily be made a Rubicon feature as well, there's nothing you can do about the engine choices and the transfer cases. A rubi should really have the 4:1 transfer case, whereas a desert runner really wouldn't want a 30mph top speed in 4lo. Additionally, the diesel engine does have heat issues, and would not be suited to a desert runner (which is why the diesel isn't an option for the Mojave to begin with. The only trim that wont let you select diesel).
As to why you couldn't just add SBD and front lockers to a mojave? that creates a defined delineation between the rubi and jave, and I don't think Jeep wanted to imply the Rubicon was the lesser of the two trims. Leaving the two trims as personal preference was almost certainly intentional.