Not even a little....This is starting to sound like the whole chicken/egg debacle. Which came first, the job or the employees?
The "careless" people leading large companies? Do clarify pleaseIf you ever had to look someone in the face and tell them their job is gone knows its the worst thing in the world to have to do. I think the fear is those that can look someone in the face and not care. The assumption often is that it is the careless people leading large companies I don't know that is true universally but it does happen often enough for the assumption to hold
Very broad statement, by design I'll assume.... what is a "livable eage" and do you include entry level min wage jobs? Is the employer the only one expected to out out the effort or does the employee bear some responsibility to better themselves to move up the chain in order to earn more?so you dont give a shit about workers who make your products actually having a living wage??? how pathetic
Fascism is mandating EV's.pro union ( able to bargain for livable wages) is not communist. Pure profit over workers is pure fascist... look up your ideologies before spreading inaccurate info ... if that matters to you
The discussion was about terminating employees. If they don't have work to perform cause sales are down, what do you want the company to do pay people to twiddle their thumbs all day? I mean didn't the UAW win the strike? Are they not making a livable wage? Your assumption on what I believe and care about is pathetic. My point still stands that if it wasn't for capitalism and companies taking risks to make a product and profit, you would not have that gladiator in your profile or the phone your texting away on.so you dont give a shit about workers who make your products actually having a living wage??? how pathetic
25 years with a large company myself. I have watched numerous lay offs over the years and seen many different styles of how they do it. I do not think there is a win-win in any way they do it.Hey teqsand
What I mean is that due to layers of management the person making the choice about layoffs never faces the person impacted. So the person impacted can walk away feeling there was no thought about them. I am not saying that is true. But when you move from a small business to large people make assumptions about others as they have never met.
I work for a large company. I have 8 layers of management above me. I would say 4 know me well. Anything above that layer coming down is from an unknown. When over the years people had to be let go. The people impacted tended to think those above they don't know didnt really care.
Just interacting with those that are making the decision seems to impact how people take it.
Working as a smaller company in the past where all management is well known. Layoffs hit just as hard but there didn't seem to be that feeling of malice towards those making the choices.
Part of that also likely due to smaller companies being more transparent about the state of business. Rarely do you get surprised in a small shop where you can see when revenue is down.
Chicken.This is starting to sound like the whole chicken/egg debacle. Which came first, the job or the employees?
Aren’t they the “job creators”?Just out of curiosity, does business exist to make profit or to provide jobs?
In this case they got a text message. A person didn’t tell them a thing.If you ever had to look someone in the face and tell them their job is gone knows its the worst thing in the world to have to do. I think the fear is those that can look someone in the face and not care. The assumption often is that it is the careless people leading large companies I don't know that is true universally but it does happen often enough for the assumption to hold
not even close.. fascism is not collectivism at all .. fascism is the exteme right... look it up chief ..Fascism is just nationalistic communism basically. It's still collectivism over individualism.