The problem is, IF you can build exactly the same yes it is cheaper. BUT most would end up with alot of things they do not want. It is only a good value if you want or have a use for it.
To get the equivalent of what I have, sticker of 60,500 I spend 62870 now.
I think it is a HUGE mistake to force painted top and flares on the X. Combination of price and that would rule an X out right off the bat. It should be cheaper base and they be options. I think they are not understanding the market again and will have an even worse year in 2024 for the JT.
HAHA you didn't need to write it 3 or 4 times. I am a big boy and can handle the criticism, Hell you may be my next best friend lol.Carlos Tavares doesn't even need to bring any lube to the party anymore.
I had to re-write this reply34 times to not sound like a jerk, so I'm really not trying to sound like a jerk- if you knew me, you'd know I'd say this just about word for word if I was standing next to you saying it instead of sitting behind a keyboard:
The logic of yours that I quoted above is so far off base from how most car buyers operate that it must be addressed. If this logic were how car buying worked for the masses, you would regularly see a far more even mix of regular and top trim levels. Your morning commute would consist largely of BRaptors, Civic Rs, F-150 Raptor Rs, Camaro 2SS, Charger and Challenger Hellcats, Shelby GT Mustangs, and Wrangler 392 Rubicons. But you don't. Because a 2x multiplier on a base MSRP doesn't make people happy. It makes people go to a different vehicle.
The fact that a potential Gladiator buyer must now spend $20,000 more than they would have 2 years ago to get Overland level features- now only available in a Rubicon X- is silly. And sure, you were right that the absolute top, most spec'd-out model might be a bit cheaper this year. But that's paying $68k(!) for a mid-sized truck. Saying that it makes it an easier pill to swallow because the person interested in the Overland trim gets lockers... that they might use... is well, I don't get it.
Ford sells 770,000 F-150s a year. There are lockers on about 5% of them. Luxury features are standard in all but the lowest trim levels, and available at every level as options on F-150s. Jeep just removed those features for anyone not willing to buy features that they won't use. Its a forced moved- migrate to spend more, or go away.
Jeep is counting on people that have more money than sense to make up the bulk of the "X" purchases. It is going to destroy demand for the Gladiator because people who can accurately assess their needs and refuse to over-spec a vehicle are going to walk.
Most people do not drive off the dealer lot getting EXACTLY what they want. There's always a compromise in anything you buy. I am not a Falken tire fan, is that going to keep me from buying the Glad, nope. I will use them till I don't want them anymore. That was point.I hear you on not being able to get things you only want. I guess I look at it as I get a little extra and maybe I will use it. You get it and don't need it or you don't get it and need it. Everyone has their reasons and I get it.
Wait- Sport gets max tow option, Sport S comes with best in class cargo/payload capacity??
Tires are nothing - where most of us are talking are larger things that either can't easily be added or can't at all, or it's too expensive (swapping a transfer case, adding ACC/FCW, etc.)Most people do not drive off the dealer lot getting EXACTLY what they want. There's always a compromise in anything you buy. I am not a Falken tire fan, is that going to keep me from buying the Glad, nope. I will use them till I don't want them anymore. That was point.
3 or 4 years ago, all of the major auto makers agreed that FCW with active braking would be standard - by September 2021 or maybe it was 2022. Covid and other factors (supply issues) screwed that up and in fact, it wasn't available at all even as an option for a while. The agreement held the feds off a bit with more strict rules. We'll do this if you don't do that sort of a thing.ACC and FCW are listed as Standard on every 2024 model on the page. Whether or not they appear on the sticker is another story.
Scripts were coded by AI ?Looking more into Jeep documents, I don't know how much I trust them. They have conflicting information on their spec sheets, brochures, and website. Just look at the Rubicon and Mojave GAWR of 2,952. The 1710lbs payload was only available with the manual transmission in the past and is now assigned to the automatic.
The interns at Jeep have some cleaning up to do...
If that AI is from microsoft - the solution is simple - reboot it.Scripts were coded by AI ?
3xIf that AI is from microsoft - the solution is simple - reboot it.
Yeah, looks like the X package.I hear you on not being able to get things you only want. I guess I look at it as I get a little extra and maybe I will use it. You get it and don't need it or you don't get it and need it. Everyone has their reasons and I get it. I was trying to show that when guys/girls are looking at a 23 vs 24, it is cheaper. Believe me, I fought with myself not to grab a 23 back in December. I am happy that I didn't pull the trigger back then.
BTW, select trac is in the description in the Auto trans. If 4H auto mode is selected trac.
![]()
MojaveThis thread cracks me up. Do you not think they did any analysis of the vehicles they have sold in the past 3 model years? I get this is an enthusiast forum, but the people posting on here are probably less than 1% of all Gladiator buyers. It sucks, but Stellantis doesn't care what any of us think because it won't impact their bottom line all that much.
The majority of Gladiator and Jeep owners in general never drive on anything more challenging than a gravel driveway and buy Rubicons or Mojaves because it is a status symbol.
Full Disclosure: I am pretty much in the majority. I do not do any hardcore wheeling. 99% of my offroad driving with my Gladiator is on the beach of Assateague Island.