Sgt Beavis
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #1
Very interesting, though they admit they need a redo.
Sponsored
Agreed. But that is so far from the norm that I agree with them that they need to retest.Just came here to post that. 40 MPG is pretty crazy.
Just a couple things. They were driving 70mph. But, I know the course they're driving (I live in the area) and it's relatively flat.30ish MPG purely 100% highway at 55 MPH with little to no hills is probably about right. Notice how they lost 57% of that fuel efficiency with only a 7,000 lb. trailer. Compare that to my Gladiator with the Pentastar which only lost 31% of its efficiency with a 6,300 lb. trailer. This matches my prior experience with diesel Jeeps which is that they do pretty good when unladen, but once you work them they start dropping MPGs like flies.
100%Agreed. But that is so far from the norm that I agree with them that they need to retest.
It still will do better MPG wise then the Pentastar and do it with more ease. The gauntlet test will the interesting one to compare the Pentastar and the Diesel30ish MPG purely 100% highway at 55 MPH with little to no hills is probably about right. Notice how they lost 57% of that fuel efficiency with only a 7,000 lb. trailer. Compare that to my Gladiator with the Pentastar which only lost 31% of its efficiency with a 6,300 lb. trailer. This matches my prior experience with diesel Jeeps which is that they do pretty good when unladen, but once you work them they start dropping MPGs like flies.
Link to article: https://www.tfltruck.com/2019/10/of...-are-here-but-is-it-the-most-efficient-video/TFL reporting EPA ratings for Ram 3.0L:
city/hwy/comb
2x4 22/32/26
4x4 21/29/24
No surprise really. They do this ALL THE FUCKING TIME!So... it's November now, and still no 3.0L choice on the Ram online build tool. :scratcheshead: