cug
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Guido
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2023
- Threads
- 13
- Messages
- 602
- Reaction score
- 663
- Location
- Christchurch, New Zealand
- Vehicle(s)
- JTR EcoDiesel, Land Cruiser 79, BMW R1250GS
- Build Thread
- Link
- Occupation
- Just keeping busy
While this might explain a small error margin, there is no reason why the computer could not be more accurate. It uses the exact same odometer value I’m using (which is surprisingly precise from what I found out by comparing with GPS on a 100km straight stretch of I5). Modern cars have incredibly precise injection data available. This is needed anyways to stay within emissions regulations. Even my 2012 Audi was able to give me consumption within 1% error margin. My 911 was the same. My wife’s 2013 Golf TDI was within 2%. There is no reason at all, why the Jeep can’t give a more precise reading than the typical 7% I have seen other than plain lying to the driver.The OBD must be using some predetermined value of "rated fuel flow" for it's calculation. I honestly don't know how the computer is doing it, but without a regularly calibrated meter (like the gas station pump has) there is no way it can return an actual fuel consumption, it's just an estimate.
Sponsored