Sponsored

Backwards MPG?

Escape.idiocracy

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rich
Joined
Jan 23, 2022
Threads
37
Messages
1,569
Reaction score
1,822
Location
PNW
Vehicle(s)
Jt
Occupation
Hitchhiker
So what's wrong with your JT?
My wife's 3.6 gets her 500 miles - about 26-27 mpg depending on the roads and speeds. Oh, that's in a Grand Cherokee - maybe that's the difference?
Um? Nothing? Zero complaints fuel economy is epic compared to the JKU’s 3.6

depending on the year GC- it might not be the same as the 2016 3.6 in the jk. Want to say the GC was the first to see the newer high compression 3.6.
Sponsored

 

ShadowsPapa

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bill
Joined
Oct 12, 2019
Threads
247
Messages
40,440
Reaction score
53,853
Location
Runnells, Iowa
Vehicle(s)
'25 JTMX, '23 JLU 4xe, '82 SX4, '73 Javelin
Occupation
Retired auto mechanic, frmr gov't ntwrk security admin
Vehicle Showcase
3
Um? Nothing? Zero complaints fuel economy is epic compared to the JKU’s 3.6

depending on the year GC- it might not be the same as the 2016 3.6 in the jk. Want to say the GC was the first to see the newer high compression 3.6.
My wife tends to trade every 2.5 to 3 years or so. We had a 15, 18 and now a 21
The 15 may have gotten 18 mpg, 20 on a great day on rural roads.
The 18 blew it away in mpg. Jumped from 18 to easy 25
the 21 does just as well and it just hit 6,000 miles so it just getting limbered up.
Yeah, I believe the Grand was the first to get the new 3.6
 

Hootbro

Well-Known Member
First Name
Don
Joined
Apr 13, 2019
Threads
57
Messages
10,172
Reaction score
19,936
Location
Delaware
Vehicle(s)
2025 Gladiator Sport
When I used the app to figure the long-term numbers, it lined up pretty close to the truck's numbers.
Yeah, my over time numbers tighten down to under a 0.75 MPG difference average. It does not calculate City MPG's all that well and has the larger error margins.
 

saintpauljeff

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jeff
Joined
Dec 5, 2017
Threads
15
Messages
636
Reaction score
435
Location
South Minneapolis, MN
Vehicle(s)
'21 Gladiator Rubi, '03 BMW Z4, '20 Mitsu OutSport
Occupation
Software Developer
31.5" tires, so you'll be winding up just a small bit more than an Overland with 32.2, and your more narrow tires explain the slightly better mpg as well.
Any increase in tire width will see those numbers drop.
Similar result with my Gladiator experience- 2020 Sport S Max Tow with the stock Bridgestone AT tire was a couple MPGs better than my 2021 Rubicon with the stock Falken tire, and the biggest contributing factor are the tires (i.e. same driving style/speeds for both)
 

BearFootSam

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jim
Joined
Oct 12, 2022
Threads
9
Messages
673
Reaction score
947
Location
PNW
Vehicle(s)
22' Gladiator Rubicon
Occupation
Fed
My wife tends to trade every 2.5 to 3 years or so. We had a 15, 18 and now a 21
The 15 may have gotten 18 mpg, 20 on a great day on rural roads.
The 18 blew it away in mpg. Jumped from 18 to easy 25
the 21 does just as well and it just hit 6,000 miles so it just getting limbered up.
Yeah, I believe the Grand was the first to get the new 3.6
I’m an anti-auto person generally but the JT has forced me to admit this slush box is really, really good as they go. The broad gear range and smooth shifting really help the efficiency. It has handled towing quite well.
 

kad's_Glad

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rufus
Joined
Jul 19, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
212
Reaction score
256
Location
Pacific Northwest
Vehicle(s)
'22 Mojave - Sting Gray
Occupation
Retired
What is this "MPG" you speak of?? I measure my fuel efficiency in "yards per gallon". As such, I'm averaging 22,880 YPG.

That's about the only way I can possibly fool myself into feeling good about my totally stock Mojave getting an average 13 MPG. :headbang:
Sponsored

 
 







Top