Sponsored

Comparison: Falken AT vs dedicated snow tires

kd1yt

Well-Known Member
First Name
Trevor
Joined
Apr 6, 2019
Threads
31
Messages
296
Reaction score
316
Location
VT 05640
Vehicle(s)
2020 Gladiator JT Sport S Red, 2014 Ural sidecar 2wd motorcycle, '51 Dodge M37
I am sharing this in case it is helpful. I am not looking to inflame anyone who thinks or prefers differently - to each their own.

One possible set of observations about whether to get dedicated snow tires or not.

My JT is a Sport S. Early on I bought a set of takeoff OEM steel wheels and installed General Grabber Arctic LT snow tires, to run in winter, and I kept the OE alloy wheels and summer tires for non-winter. I have been pleased with the snows.

I live in VT, snow is common, and, unfortunately, icy conditions are becoming more and more common as time goes by. And, as time goes by, more and more people drive like idiots in the winter, as if 4WD or AWD make them invincible.

This fall, I bought a set of near-new Mojave wheels/tires with the Falken AT tires. The Falken AT have the "three-peak mountain snowflake (3PMSF)" rating which place them in a much better capability for snow than most all-season or all-terrain tires.

If I had the Falken ATs with 3PMSF on the truck originally, I might not have gotten snow tires. Which probably would have been OK, overall

I was really tempted to just leave the Falkens on and maybe sell my steelies with snows. But I also already own the steelies with snows and my philosophy is if the snows keep me out of having to have any body repairs done on my truck, especially by helping me evade stupid situations caused by idiot drivers in winter conditions, they've earned their keep, and are worth the effort to swap on - since I already own them, I figured I'd stick to the plan.

I didn't get around to putting my steelies/ snows on until today. VT has had a series of snows and rains and temperatures cycling above and below freezing in the last several weeks and I have now driven the Falkens in up to 5-6" of unplowed, unpacked snow, uphill, off pavement, and (separate from the unplowed, unpacked snow) in glazed icy conditions, and in fresh snow on top of the glazed conditions.

My conclusion: the Falken AT tires ROCK in unplowed snow as long as there is something with some bite, like gravel, at the bottom of the snow. The Falkens' "go" traction in those conditions may likely even surpass traditional snow tires.

But, on slick conditions, like a glazed icy surface, and especially new snow on top of an icy glazed surface, the snowtires dramatically outperform the Falkens at maintaining traction, for both acceleration and for braking and steering. This is what I like dedicated snows for, to give me better control in the situations in which I may be sharing the road with idiots, under worst-case low traction situations. I did the same test "run" up the same section of unpaved winding uphill partially-plowed (mostly just packed and partially icy, un-sanded, no bare ground) private road this afternoon right before and right after swapping wheels and tires.

I would not say that the Falken ATs with 3PMSF are "lacking" - the Falkens seem like superb tires under any conditions - only that I can tell favorable differences with dedicated snow tires.

Again, to each their own. Everyone has their own set of conditions, and preferences. Just sharing some observations, in case it might be helpful to someone.
Sponsored

 

dcmdon

Well-Known Member
First Name
Don
Joined
Mar 31, 2021
Threads
60
Messages
3,656
Reaction score
4,427
Location
Boston Metro-West, Northern NH
Vehicle(s)
.
This has been my experience in NH with snows. Nothing is better in real world snow than snow tires.

By real world I mean packed powder possibly with ice underneath it. Its only snowed a few times where we are. In NH and our street is already a sheet of ice and this morning it had another inch over the ice. Swell.

Fresh powder exists for just a few minutes. Its the next 3 days of crap that matters. And nothing beats snows.

I've been trying to find a set of Nokians in 315/70-17s and they are backordered nationally. I'll have my Gladiator within a month. It will be embarrassing to have my wife have to pull me out of something with her AWD Volvo on Michelin snow tires. ha.

Also thanks for the info on the ATs. I may be on the factory Falken ATs for this winter if I can't find any of the snows that I want for it.
 

brianinca

Well-Known Member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Jun 8, 2020
Threads
22
Messages
1,329
Reaction score
1,384
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
2020 Gladiator Rubicon
Occupation
IT Manager
This is very interesting context for the OEM tires, thanks for the writeup. We like to VISIT snow in the mountains, and I swapped the Falken AT's over to my little YJ. Only got one trip to the snow with it last year, not enough snow is a recurring theme in CA right now. I expected the Falken's to be way better than the KM2's I put on the shelf, yeah of course they were, but that's not a useful comparison like you have made. Hopefully we'll get enough snow Thursday for a topless run this weekend!

I am sharing this in case it is helpful. I am not looking to inflame anyone who thinks or prefers differently - to each their own.

One possible set of observations about whether to get dedicated snow tires or not.

My JT is a Sport S. Early on I bought a set of takeoff OEM steel wheels and installed General Grabber Arctic LT snow tires, to run in winter, and I kept the OE alloy wheels and summer tires for non-winter. I have been pleased with the snows.

I live in VT, snow is common, and, unfortunately, icy conditions are becoming more and more common as time goes by. And, as time goes by, more and more people drive like idiots in the winter, as if 4WD or AWD make them invincible.

This fall, I bought a set of near-new Mojave wheels/tires with the Falken AT tires. The Falken AT have the "three-peak mountain snowflake (3PMSF)" rating which place them in a much better capability for snow than most all-season or all-terrain tires.

If I had the Falken ATs with 3PMSF on the truck originally, I might not have gotten snow tires. Which probably would have been OK, overall

I was really tempted to just leave the Falkens on and maybe sell my steelies with snows. But I also already own the steelies with snows and my philosophy is if the snows keep me out of having to have any body repairs done on my truck, especially by helping me evade stupid situations caused by idiot drivers in winter conditions, they've earned their keep, and are worth the effort to swap on - since I already own them, I figured I'd stick to the plan.

I didn't get around to putting my steelies/ snows on until today. VT has had a series of snows and rains and temperatures cycling above and below freezing in the last several weeks and I have now driven the Falkens in up to 5-6" of unplowed, unpacked snow, uphill, off pavement, and (separate from the unplowed, unpacked snow) in glazed icy conditions, and in fresh snow on top of the glazed conditions.

My conclusion: the Falken AT tires ROCK in unplowed snow as long as there is something with some bite, like gravel, at the bottom of the snow. The Falkens' "go" traction in those conditions may likely even surpass traditional snow tires.

But, on slick conditions, like a glazed icy surface, and especially new snow on top of an icy glazed surface, the snowtires dramatically outperform the Falkens at maintaining traction, for both acceleration and for braking and steering. This is what I like dedicated snows for, to give me better control in the situations in which I may be sharing the road with idiots, under worst-case low traction situations. I did the same test "run" up the same section of unpaved winding uphill partially-plowed (mostly just packed and partially icy, un-sanded, no bare ground) private road this afternoon right before and right after swapping wheels and tires.

I would not say that the Falken ATs with 3PMSF are "lacking" - the Falkens seem like superb tires under any conditions - only that I can tell favorable differences with dedicated snow tires.

Again, to each their own. Everyone has their own set of conditions, and preferences. Just sharing some observations, in case it might be helpful to someone.
 

jeepin48

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jake
Joined
Sep 10, 2020
Threads
10
Messages
418
Reaction score
437
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
JT Overland 3.0L
Occupation
Engineer
How did they compare to ride handling/harshness? I swap to snow tires on my Subaru primarily so they are smoother in the colder temps. IMO the Falken AT ride harsh.
 

dcmdon

Well-Known Member
First Name
Don
Joined
Mar 31, 2021
Threads
60
Messages
3,656
Reaction score
4,427
Location
Boston Metro-West, Northern NH
Vehicle(s)
.
How did they compare to ride handling/harshness? I swap to snow tires on my Subaru primarily so they are smoother in the colder temps. IMO the Falken AT ride harsh.
That's an interesting perspective. I'm guessing this is because snows are made of softer tread compound than other tires.

In my case, the snows on my cars have smaller wheels and higher profile tires also, so there is more sidewall to absorb the impacts that happen in winter. Also a little extra ground clearance never hurts. The cars feel floatier but do ride better.
 

Sponsored

OP
OP

kd1yt

Well-Known Member
First Name
Trevor
Joined
Apr 6, 2019
Threads
31
Messages
296
Reaction score
316
Location
VT 05640
Vehicle(s)
2020 Gladiator JT Sport S Red, 2014 Ural sidecar 2wd motorcycle, '51 Dodge M37
How did they compare to ride handling/harshness? I swap to snow tires on my Subaru primarily so they are smoother in the colder temps. IMO the Falken AT ride harsh.
Just having a chance now to circle back, been swamped at work.

It's hard to compare apples to apples in my situation.

My snowtires are Load Range E LT tires, so they are heavy in weight and pretty rigid-sidewalled for their size (my snows are same size as the OE Sport tire size: 245/75R17).

The Sport S original 'summer' tires are 245/75R17 and I forget if they even have a listed load range, they're pretty light, with pretty floppy sidewalls, bordering on kind of ridiculously so for a truck.

So the "Range E" snowtires ride more stiffly than the OE summer tires, and, with the extra tire weight of Load Range E tires, and additional weight of the steel rims, handle a bit more clumsily than the OE summer tires- nothing awful, but just heavier handling.

The Falken ATs are Load Range C and are 285/70R17 so they are bigger and heavier than 245/75R17. They are not as stiff-riding as the Load Range E snowtires. Because of the larger diameter and weight and my 3.73 axle and 6MT transmission, the Falkens definitely alter the vehicle's responses compared to the 245/75R17 OE summer Sport S tires - but not in any way that I find objectionable. In fact, I like the overall ride and response characteristics of the Falkens the best, it's just that my dedicated snows have best winter traction.

I would say that, at least out of what I have experienced so far, the Load Range C (like the Falken AT) is a sweet spot and I would not by choice get Load Range E snowtires again (or Load Range E summer tires), although I'd happened to get a really good deal on the high-quality General Grabber Load Range E snowtires back when I bought them in late 2019, and they should hold up well (and seem to be, so far). I also would not by choice buy tires as light-duty, for any season, as the OE Sport S tires.
 

Mac

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2017
Threads
33
Messages
2,177
Reaction score
2,375
Location
MA
Vehicle(s)
2020 JT Hydro Blue Max Tow
Good info, I would imagine if you had the Falken ATs in the same size as your snow tires the differences would be less between the two. Narrower tires generally do much better in slick conditions as they have a higher psi on the ground they are in contact with.
 

USMC-SSGT

Well-Known Member
First Name
Shawn
Joined
Sep 6, 2021
Threads
48
Messages
647
Reaction score
1,025
Location
Northeast
Vehicle(s)
2021 Gladiator Overland
Occupation
Aluminum tubing transport
I’ve got ❄ ❄ ❄ rated Baja Boss tires and live in NH. Curious to see how they handle.

Not sure my true snow options in a 35” tire out there. I could run 32s or 33s but on a lifted jeep it would look like it skipped leg day.
 
OP
OP

kd1yt

Well-Known Member
First Name
Trevor
Joined
Apr 6, 2019
Threads
31
Messages
296
Reaction score
316
Location
VT 05640
Vehicle(s)
2020 Gladiator JT Sport S Red, 2014 Ural sidecar 2wd motorcycle, '51 Dodge M37
Good info, I would imagine if you had the Falken ATs in the same size as your snow tires the differences would be less between the two. Narrower tires generally do much better in slick conditions as they have a higher psi on the ground they are in contact with.
Agreed that there would be a narrower extent of difference. I used to hang around on a Ford IDI diesel forum and guys used to refer to the [then] especially common commercial truck size 235/85/16 as "pizza cutters" and they were really good in the snow, with almost any reasonable tread pattern, for the exact reason you mention. But I imagine most people buying a tire like the Falken are choosing wider tires (if Falken even makes the AT in narrow patterns?) because of other things that they want. Given what you mention, the Falken are actually surprisingly good in the snow, with their wide profile.
 

Mac

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2017
Threads
33
Messages
2,177
Reaction score
2,375
Location
MA
Vehicle(s)
2020 JT Hydro Blue Max Tow
Agreed that there would be a narrower extent of difference. I used to hang around on a Ford IDI diesel forum and guys used to refer to the [then] especially common commercial truck size 235/85/16 as "pizza cutters" and they were really good in the snow, with almost any reasonable tread pattern, for the exact reason you mention. But I imagine most people buying a tire like the Falken are choosing wider tires (if Falken even makes the AT in narrow patterns?) because of other things that they want. Given what you mention, the Falken are actually surprisingly good in the snow, with their wide profile.
I ran a set of the Falken AT3W tires briefly last year in the winter, they seemed very good in the snow to me.
Sponsored

 
 







Top