Zachanadandy
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Zach
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2023
- Threads
- 4
- Messages
- 3,032
- Reaction score
- 4,820
- Location
- Patterson, ca
- Vehicle(s)
- 2023 gladiator Mojave
- Occupation
- Electrical foreman
I agree with that for sure. I'll still argue that more power is money better spent but for 40s with my freeway driving I'd probably go 4.88s, maybe 5.13s. The JT just isn't a great crawler platform anyway with its long wheelbase and long rear overhang. I'll take the JLUR for crawling any day. The tcase makes a hell of a difference for crawling with no drawbacks for street driving. Your sport only has a 52:1 crawl ratio. Even if you regear to 5.13s you're only at 65:1. Swap in a rubi tcase and you're at 77:1 with stock axle gears. Did you actually weigh the suk? 2k stock but you added bigger axles, a bigger motor, a doubler, bigger tires, and a cage without gaining any weight? I'd better closer to 3k pounds built. Even if we are optimistic and say 2500lbs that's 25.77lbs/hp vs the JT at 17.89lbs/hp. That's 31% better power to weight ratio which is why the JT will 0-60 in 7s and the suk won't. The stock sami was 17-18s 0-60 with a top speed of 77mph. Wouldn't even hit modem speed limits.I meant 3 speed
You would have to know that pic and the days of my old zuk are from 2007 power to weight 97 hp in a 2000 lb rig that ultimately became a buggy on 39's
However I was kinda half agreeing with you on modern drivetrains.. the JT however is just as under powered @ 285 hp weighing 5100lbs. power to weight is not far off of each
and the zuk was geared better stock
MY JT has 4.10 sport tcase and 35's it definitely needs more gear and power to move up to the 40's i would like
Sponsored
Last edited:
