Starwood gets laughed at on most forums for a reason...^^Exactly. Most of their stuff looks "baller" anyway, so the above rendering for an overland vehicle is a surprise. Based on what they've built before, I'm not really interested. Maybe the engineering is there, but if I had the crazy amount of $ they likely want for it, AEV would be where I'd spend it first...
Shorter wheelbase/improved break over angle would be reason for serious offroadersI saw that on the JL forums a few months back. I don't understand why they would cut up a JL when the JT is coming. Just seems like a HUGE expense for no reason.
Thomas the tank engine had a bastard child with a wrx ?“Ugly” as it were requires you to excel in other areas like speed or capability. Sadly I don't think there is enough performance envelope to justify all the exposed bright fasteners and rhino-lined everything in a Starwood rig. Pimpmobile except they traded glitter flake for rhino, exposed fasteners for chintze and obnoxious lift and ugly wheels for drops and daytons. Off-road donks is all they are to me.
In my area it has not been at all uncommon to see a sport wrangler being sold at a considerable premium because it had “30k in mods!” most of which amount to huge wheels and bald mudders, useless lifts, stinger bars wrapped in poly rope, a zillion led cubes aimed wrong, crap and blinky led headlights/taillights, a roof rack with a dry rotted tire, rusted shovel pick and axe set and a hi-lift jack seized from salt and sand corrosion.
And then there’s this guy.