J Sierra
Well-Known Member
The numbers look wrong to me looks like a data format problem. These numbers are the same past 3.5 and 3.0.
3.59999990463257
3.09999990463257
3.59999990463257
3.09999990463257
Sponsored
I can't disagree with how it appears. The numbers look OK in the live display but leave question marks in my mind in their logs.The numbers look wrong to me looks like a data format problem. These numbers are the same past 3.5 and 3.0.
3.59999990463257
3.09999990463257
And........ ?I bought a battery monitor $25 from Amazon. It gives battery voltage and temperature to your phone. Measures percent of charge, staring test, charging test, all while you drive. It gives a rolling graph for all the tests.
The numbers look wrong to me looks like a data format problem. These numbers are the same past 3.5 and 3.0.
3.59999990463257
3.09999990463257
I wonder if the additional digits are just log identifiers for each reading: resistance, current, voltage… in JScan.I can't disagree with how it appears. The numbers look OK in the live display but leave question marks in my mind in their logs.
If you look at the raw numbers as it's being displayed, live in the app, it's correct, to the hundredths position.
I've used my Fluke, for example, to compare to what these apps display vs. what the cluster displays and so on - live it's fine. At least as far as voltages.
Either way, regardless of where things lie, anyone should for the sake of sanity ignore anything past 2 decimal places in this sort of thing.
I contacted JSCAN a while back about their log export format for other reasons besides this.
So yeah, in the other posts anything beyond hundredths should be ignored as noise, data issues.
(it's a good call)
I've contacted the jscan folks to see what's up because the "logs" such as they are, are also filled with a lot of white space - in some cases dozens of blank lines between lines.I wonder if the additional digits are just log identifiers for each reading: resistance, current, voltage… in JScan.
I'm not sure I agree with your assesment of the value of a Bluetooth battery testor for the purpose of this thread. If your goal is to test "Your battery voltage - truck off and at rest", then having the BT battery testor hooked up allows you to read the voltage without touching the truck.And........ ?
Percent of charge is an estimate based on the battery voltage, temperature and other conditions (including battery type) so it's not likely to be totally accurate for $25 unless it's AGM specific and knows the battery like the IBS/PCM is programmed for.
So technically, you use your Off Road Pages or cluster and look at the voltage and can know the SoC as close as a $25 volt meter can.
Unless it also goes between the cable and the terminal, it can't do much more.
Starting test - can't do anything other than tell you the voltage as you crank it - and that doesn't mean a lot without knowing the starter draw (is the starter healthy, hot? cold?) battery health (the older a battery gets, the further the same starter draw will drop the battery voltage).
Charging test - it has no idea unless it's fit between the terminal and a cable and measures amperage. It would have to know resistance levels, and more to know how it's charging. A battery with high resistance will not take the same "amps" in at 15 volts as a different battery and temperature will matter.
I have voltage, temperature and more on my phone reading directly from the truck's computers via historical data in the BCM and PCM and the currents from the IBS.
Such a device is off the map as far as the purpose of this thread getting to the root of a few other things.
Can't actually test the battery, only measure the voltage unless that's what you meant - and at that, it can't do that unless the PCR is open. It's measuring the equalized voltage of both batteries.One thing that the BT battery tester can do the the BT OBD adapter can't is test the aux battery.
Would be dependent on the software used. There's 12v at the port.While you can do the same thing with a Bluetooth OBD adapter, do we know if the BT OBD adapter is reading voltage directly or reading it from another module?
That makes sense. You could chart BOTH batteries. However, will the app let you compare or display both, or is it a choose this device or choose that device and one at a time?I have 2 one on the AUX, one on the main battery. They have rolling displays, as I drive the ESS event is captured. I can see the restart as a dip in the main battery voltage. I can see the AUX battery during the ESS event, goes down a bit. The rolling display goes as long as the phone is near the jeep, weeks in my case. I can see all the starts all the ESS events.
LOL - I've wondered for a couple of years why they don't do something better about charging these.One at a time so on a long trip I used my wife's phone. This is what I found, the battery's never get fully charged 90 percent max. Going down hill for miles the battery voltage went up 0.2V. I think it is intentional not to charge the battery's all the way, to protect the battery's from over charge and to leave room for charge going down long hills. That sounds silly to me, might save gas. It will log 2 weeks I think. You can export the logs to a file of some sort I have not tried that. The current draw is 1.5 milli amps.