No, it most certainly should not. That's just as bad, if not worse, writing. And you conveniently left out "that really do give auto enthusiasts a bad name". That's important, because it's true.I know nothing about Sinister Diesel specifically but my opinion is they should change the article from saying:
Like many of these shops, Sinsiter sold devices, tuners, and software that allowed owners to convert otherwise emission-compliant trucks into coal-rolling, exhaust-spewing nuisance machines
to
Like many of these shops, Sinsiter sold devices, tuners, and software that allowed owners to convert emission-handicapped trucks into more capable and reliable vehicles with significantly increased MPG and lower maintenance costs.
Let's be honest though, for every guy that just wanted a nondescript delete tune for their daily, there is probably 10+ of the rolling coal douche nozzles that brought attention to it in the first place.Like many of these shops, Sinsiter sold devices, tuners, and software that allowed owners to convert emission-handicapped trucks into more capable and reliable vehicles with significantly increased MPG and lower maintenance costs.
I thought they’d lost those in that boating accident last May or the one before?Plea agreement. So if you bought anything from Sinister. You might be getting a knock on your door from the EPA. Because I bet part of that agreement was that they turn over their records.
Is there actual linkable research showing the 10%-20% MPG savings of a delete vehicle is more emissions efficient than a non delete compliant one? Seen that argument repeated a lot but never backed up. Almost a straw man argument.I disagree with your comment "rolling coal" as the kids say is annoying that I agree but when they do there research on emissions they leave out all the extra emissions from manufacturing of def and emissions control they also leave out the fact that deleted trucks get 10 or 20 % better fuel mileage so thats less fuel consumed equals less emissions I've have deleted trucks that didn't "roll coal" I'm a used truck dealer and most tuners the "roll coal" is a setting thats a kid thing my opinion I think they should stay the hell out from my diesel engine
Not sure on research but heard it from a guys that has way over 1 million miles on deleted truck 160 to 200k every year and has used both thats all the facts I need I drive alot and pass semi everyday that are emmision compliant that spew 10 time exhaust deleted trucks doI there actual linkable research showing the 10%-20% MPG savings of a delete vehicle is more emissions efficient than a non delete compliant one? Seen that argument repeated a lot but never backed up. Almost a straw man argument.
Quick Google search shows up to 80% more nox emissions for a deleted diesel. 10-20% better fuel economy definitely does not make up for significantly worse emissions. This is also not counting particulate matter increases and one study had a delete on 2017+ diesels as 1 vehicle producing the same amount of nox and particulates as 30 non-deleted trucks of the same model.Not sure on research but heard it from a guys that has way over 1 million miles on deleted truck 160 to 200k every year and has used both thats all the facts I need I drive alot and pass semi everyday that are emmision compliant that spew 10 time exhaust deleted trucks do
I hope your not a guy that believes a quick google search from some liberal in there basement? The thing you need to consider is the source? Are they really getting guys with deleted truck to do testing? I agree to disagree with you on this have a great dayQuick Google search shows up to 80% more nox emissions for a deleted diesel. 10-20% better fuel economy definitely does not make up for significantly worse emissions.