Rubianderson
Active Member
- Thread starter
- #16
Hey thanks for commenting.If you're loading it up with 750lbs, why try to maintain the rake? The rake exists so the trick sits level when loaded, are you planning to load it significantly more on top of the 750lbs? I think you're into a bit of trial and error territory as I doubt you'll find anyone with the exact setup to determine what you're after. I'd guess that a set of 1.5" lift HD springs from Clayton in the rear would get you really close to what you're after. I'd start there and if you want a little more rake add the appropriate height spacer once you get it set on the HD springs under load. Unless you run dump truck hard springs you will have some decent sag with that kind of weight.
Clayton certainly keeps coming up.
I'm more convinced now that the properly engineered springs and shocks package can ride similar to stock. And is the direction ill have to go.
Goldilocks situation, one too hard one too soft, and one JUST right.
My reason for stock rake.
1- prevents headlights from pointing high, definitly not pointing at the factory set/road legal point when overly squated, keeping it friendly to oncoming traffic and properly washing the road ahead.
I'm not much for rows of extra addon lights.
2- hey i'm old, grew up with cars/trucks with a rake-looks cool. It was actually functional for muscle cars back then, allowing for weight transfer to rear for max trax on those rear wheels, and agin it looked cool : ) And I think we all build our jeeps for functionallity for our intended use, with a bit of an eye towards looking cool, whatever that means to each individual.
THX, Steve.
Sponsored