wooderson
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2017
- Threads
- 15
- Messages
- 304
- Reaction score
- 299
- Location
- North Dakota
- Vehicle(s)
- Nissan
Anymore information on what wide track deta are?And wide track better fitment to gravity
Sponsored
Anymore information on what wide track deta are?And wide track better fitment to gravity
For me it's test drive. The fronts are wider too. Better steering? So people are saying it's not much wider. I'm saying wider enough to sell it that way. So lower gears wider stance, could be significant performance improvement at lower speeds and even higher fwy speeds. Know this doesn't answer your questions but the deets are available on this site, look for the specs pages for the exact ones you want. I'll try to find the link and post hereAnymore information on what wide track deta are?
also towing capabilities?Basically comes down to 3.73 vs 4.10...
Tbh I range do it by KMs per tank. These guys are averaging 600kms to a tank so that’s pretty decent.
I was getting about 520-550 in my JK on 37s.
Reminds me of my old Pontiac Grand PrixFor me it's test drive. The fronts are wider too. Better steering? So people are saying it's not much wider. I'm saying wider enough to sell it that way. So lower gears wider stance, could be significant performance improvement at lower speeds and even higher fwy speeds. Know this doesn't answer your questions but the deets are available on this site, look for the specs pages for the exact ones you want. I'll try to find the link and post here
I would be happy with 16 mpg on 35's!What do you define as great mileage? 12-15 | 16-19 | 20+ ? I only ask because the OP indicated 16MPG with 35’s could be acceptable.
The axle difference: standard vs. wide track. Tire size and gears affect tow numbers. So all you guys going 37's without re-gearing... your tow numbers effectively fall off the map. Even with re-gearing, the added weight of the big tires will affect your tow numbers.also towing capabilities?
EDIT: overland only 6,000, rubicon, 7,000.
Why is this? Aren't some of the components just bigger, heavier duty?
LMAO. And true
Wider is better
My understanding is the "Max tow" and 4:10's are not available on the Overland.also towing capabilities?
EDIT: overland only 6,000, rubicon, 7,000.
Why is this? Aren't some of the components just bigger, heavier duty?
Besides finishes how much different is the Overland then the Sports models?To the OP,
Overland is the cushy version of the JT.
That said, if you want great fuel economy and a soft ride, look elsewhere.
"It's a Jeep thing"
You can get decent fuel economy with the diesel, but there is $ premium attached to
that in many different ways. (Initial cost, fuel, DEF, maintanence).
If you look at the closest thing you can compare the Gladiator to, which is it's cousin the Wrangler, the Rubicon versions are getting much lower fuel efficiency across the board than the Sports, apples to apples.For roughly the past 20 years I have owned an F-150 and a two-door Wrangler. I am 99.9% sure I'm going to order a gladiator the day the order banks open. I plan to sell my truck and my 2013 JKR. My question is what do y'all think is the best daily driver setup. I'm kind of concerned about 410 gears. My F-150 averages 18.5 miles per gallon. My JKR averages about 16 and 1/2. I would really like to get the best MPG possible. I do not plan to run anything over a 33-in tire. I was just looking for opinions on the best do it all daily driver gladiator. I don't really tow a whole lot. Really just need a bed for odds and ends. My other concern is comfort. My F-150 is like driving a limousine. Point and go. My JKR drives like your typical Jeep. If I had to choose what to drive five straight hours I would choose to F-150. Do you think the gladiator will drive better than a JKU or JK?