desertfox73
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Steve
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2019
- Threads
- 13
- Messages
- 242
- Reaction score
- 418
- Location
- Nashville, TN
- Vehicle(s)
- Gladiator Rubicon LE, 2019 Raptor SCrew
Well, we just wont see eye to eye on this one...agreed that they should have the option to do what they want, since they’re a business, just that they would choose to have such a restrictive policy about mods. My insurance company has no issue with mods - cosmetic, performance or otherwise.The excluded types of modifications void your policy. They only have to pay to what is in the contract. And if the contract says they dont cover vehicles modded to lift above 6” or have a turbo installed that increases hp, it is no longer an insured vehicle. That means they dont have to pay, period. It will depend on the actual wording of your contract. Other folks on other forums with other insurance companies have said their vehicle wasnt covered because it was modded too much. I suspect Geico, State Farm, and Allstate, have about the same attitude and their own requirements. Every insurance company has explicitly stated coverage. They have paragraphs for terms like “road”, “claim”, “insured”, “vehicle” and “driver”. It is up to the individual to know these terms
And it is totally fair. The company assessed the risk of covering your vehicle when it was in one state of being. You modify it enough and the risk changes to where they would either charge you more premium or not cover you at all. And they dont do it willy nilly, their number crunchers looked at who was claiming under what circumstances and mathematically the risk:cost was too much. Now, if someone wants coverage for off-road vehicles, monster trucks, etc they can get it. The insurance company can look at that.
Comparing car insurance to health insurance doesnt work. I pay $250/mo for my 2 vehicles, and $1250/mo for my family’s health insurance. I have never had to file a car insurance claim, but I have had to use health insurance every year multiple times. Not even close in comparison of costs and risks
Also, if certain types of modding void coverage (ie void the contract) and you have an accident where the company chooses not to cover you on the basis of the modifications, I assume you could just provide them with a date of the modifications, and ask for a refund of all premiums paid since then, right? After all, if the mods void the contract then they shouldn’t legally be charging you for a service they knowingly won’t provide.
As for the healthcare point, i wasn’t comparing risks/costs, I was comparing the essential nature of what those businesses are - socialized mandatory systems that seem capricious in their decision making.
Sponsored