I would definitely step up on the oil changes and not go as long as, well, don't run the miles up like I do. I have more controlled conditions, less loading, and less heat and so on. I'm not afraid to follow the oil life monitor.I just ordered the 5W-40 Euro-spec oil, the Mopar anti-freeze, a new drain plug, and the Dorman aluminum oil filter housing with oil cooler. Might as well swap out the plastic unit while I have it torn down.
Mine is still very close to the full mark between changes. I've never needed to add anything. I'd say they've never even been a pint low.
A pint is nothing - why bother with that?
I'm not sure why you would bother changing until a change was needed or it was a quart low.
I really hope he has serious brake upgrades to help slow/stop all that extra heft.Yeah, I’m right there.
Wanna hear something funny/crazy? My buddy weighed his JLU right after me and he was at 7400 lbs. No trailer
He’s on 40’s but damn
Copy thatI would definitely step up on the oil changes and not go as long as, well, don't run the miles up like I do. I have more controlled conditions, less loading, and less heat and so on. I'm not afraid to follow the oil life monitor.
I'd cut it like they suggest as you'll not only have more loading but likely more fuel contamination as well. If it was mine, depending on how I was driving, the weather and so on, I might push 4,000, but otherwise, the 3500 miles would probably be my personal norm. But you'll know how you drive it, how long you drive it and under what conditions.
Ethanol runs a lot cooler, less carbon build-up and resists detonation under pressure - not sure what they say about gas with ethanol.......... would be interested in their comments on gas with ethanol and their product.
OK, OK, hold on-While a SC sounds great , I am just done with throwing money into this thing. There are days if someone gave me a good offer, I would sign the pink and be done with it.
Love it - reminds me of this one -@ShadowsPapa
Was checking out after supper at Cracker Barrel and saw this. Immediately thought of you.
![]()
Adding 37s+ tires and it'll be even lower mpg.Not for the larger V8
Even the optimistic numbers on a JLU window sticker aren't much better than that.
EPA says 14 combined, reality in the forums and elsewhere suggests 12 mpg for a 392 V8
We talked about the V8 with our sales guy when talking a JLU for my wife. Even he suggested she'd not be happy with the mpg and few actually get the sticker numbers. He could have upsold.
The Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 392 gets an EPA-estimated 13 MPG city, 17 MPG highway, and 14 MPG combined, thanks to its powerful 6.4L V8 HEMI engine, though real-world mileage often falls lower, sometimes into the low teens, especially with aggressive driving or larger off-road tires. Drivers report that enjoying the V8's sound and performance often results in figures closer to 10-12 MPG in mixed conditions.
I just let em pass piss on itEven at 65-70 with 3.5" of lift and 37s it's 14mpg at best. I realize my speed doesn't help, but out here you get pased by semis if you're under 75mph and in AZ half of them are rolling 80+. The lift and tires don't help either. I still argue that more adequate power for my harder than most use wouldn't hurt mpg at all and on roadtrips it would likely help. If that power comes from boost or a v8 swap, either way it's going to downshift less and therefore run lower average rpms in my experience. Obviously when I'm out playing with all of that extra 150 wheel hp the mileage will be crap... but it's already crap if I'm using all 215 wheel hp and spinning the 3.6L up to 6k rpm.