ShadowsPapa
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Bill
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2019
- Threads
- 247
- Messages
- 40,442
- Reaction score
- 53,859
- Location
- Runnells, Iowa
- Vehicle(s)
- '25 JTMX, '23 JLU 4xe, '82 SX4, '73 Javelin
- Occupation
- Retired auto mechanic, frmr gov't ntwrk security admin
- Vehicle Showcase
- 3
One would think so - however, do we have a stack-up of tolerances here? A case where over time that race/cup was allowed to turn just enough that it very gradually wore and worked deeper into the tube.......... that could be caused by any one or any combination of things that hold it secure.But if they’ve machined them all this way, shouldn’t they all leak?
Tolerances on the retainer or the ring between retainer and seal? Tolerances of the seal? Of the bearing and cup, of the housing? If each was in spec, but on the "loose side", you have a loose assembly.
You can have a crankshaft crankpin in spec, a bearing in spec, rod in spec, and end up with a rod that has too much clearance on the crankshaft (too much for me, anyway)
It's why no matter what, I check final assembly of parts and don't just put it together because each part measures in spec.
I rebuilt a differential 3 or 4 years ago. When I got the carrier out I realized that the cup for the right side carrier bearing had been turning in the casting, under the cap. It scored the shim that was against it, holding preload on the bearings, slight burnishing of the recess where the cup sat and the cap that held it in place. I caught it before it did any more than score up a shim. Why did it start to turn to begin with with all of that pressure on it? The differential was quiet - not an odd noise out of it at all.
This is an odd one for sure - I wish people that had this sort of thing, or that found leaking axles, was close by. I'd make room in my shop and leave no stone unturned to find the original issue if at all possible. I'm a nut for "why did something fail" and love forensics, fine detail work.
Sponsored