- Banned
- #31
What’s the F stand for sorry I dunno thatThey can both do general offroading just as well. SFA is vastly superior for rock crawling. You just can't articulate an IFS like you can an SFA.
People are doing solid front axle swaps on the new bronco, and it's not a cheap swap.
thanks, man!Meh, there's still more articulating to the solid than IFS. Yes, IFS has matured and improved, but there's still only so much that can be done.
The upper control arm of Bronco straddles the spring, and the steering knuckle rides fairly close, so that upper arm can only swing down so far before it has to stop, there's no way around it. They did compensate by curving the knuckle back behind the spring and the upper control arm is also configured to keep the ball joint to the rear of the spring. They gained ground there, but the upper arm itself still can swing down only so far.
I am not going to trash the Bronco - they clearly aimed for a good on-road experience. Lower unsprung weight, R&P steering, they aimed for more road, occasional off-road with some limits.
A solid axle pivots almost from the opposite side of the vehicle, IFS pivots on the same side as the control arms and only a few inches in. It's just impossible to get the same articulation. Can't be done.
The strength of the arms and the tie rods sort of makes me nervous - I can see those busting if you tried to keep up with your buddy's Wrangler in really rough, rocky places.
But max articulation wasn't their goal. Stability and tight steering on the road, even rough roads, handling washboard roads better, it's a compromise and I can see people buying them who don't climb 60" tall rocks every weekend but want to get off road and not get caught crossing a ravine.
![]()
Sponsored