BourbonRunner
Well-Known Member
Yes, for some reason the typical American consumer doesn't "get" diesels, be it in a passenger car or light truck. The rest of the world does... Is it because of the nanny features? The memory of the Olds V8 Diesel is 40 years+ old now, it can't be that, right?The only people who seem to feel this way are people who own a Jeep with a diesel. I think most truck buyers know that the diesel was a bit silly. The average truck owner who buys a 3/4 or 1 ton pickup with a diesel sees it as a tool. Those vehicles have payload and tow ratings that far exceed the 1/2 ton trucks, so the extra costs and complexity associated with buying a diesel are negated by the benefits of owning a diesel. In the case of the Gladiator, the diesel engine was so much heavier that payload and towing limits were actually less. The consequence was that the type of buyer who bought the diesel Gladiator was the same type of person who buys a 3/4 or 1 ton pickup with a diesel but has nothing to carry or tow. It's just a toy. That coupled with the fact that Stellantis chose an Italian-made diesel with a ton of issues only made matters worse, and the diesel Gladiator was short lived. As someone who has owned diesel trucks and has done countless 4 gallon oil changes and fuel filter changes and encountered many DPF issues, I can say that the average Jeep owner really does not want to deal with all that mess.
I still don't understand why FCA/Stellantis doesn't use the Cummins R2.8 instead of the VM.
Also: We had the opportunity to compare a fully kitted out Mojave and JLUR-D in California crawling trails in the desert a couple years ago and the JLUR had enough torque at idle and mostly went in RWD to do what the Mojave had to do in 4Hi. Aside from that, the JLUR with identical mileage to the JTM had to be filled up about 2/3 as much as the JTM did. Granted, the JTM was much heavier along with the SmartCap and slide out with all the fixings, but both had RTT's and all the aerodynamic qualities of a brick wall.
Sponsored